What Are the Security Risks and Vulnerabilities of WLFI's Smart Contracts?

11/5/2025, 10:00:38 AM
This article explores the security risks and vulnerabilities of WLFI's smart contracts, focusing on their governance model during security incidents and high-profile breaches. Key topics include WLFI's multi-signature governance, an exploit in Ethereum's EIP-7702 leading to significant token theft, and the controversial blacklisting of major investor wallets. The piece is essential for crypto investors or security experts seeking to understand protective measures and attack impacts on token value. Keywords optimized for easy scan: WLFI, smart contracts, security, governance, blacklisting, token theft.

WLFI implements multi-signature governance during security risks

World Liberty Financial (WLF) protocol has established a robust security framework through its multi-signature governance mechanism, which activates during critical situations. According to official documentation, this governance control takes effect during two specific scenarios: security risks that might compromise user safety or cause operational cessation, and major adverse events that prevent normal protocol functioning for extended periods.

During these emergencies, governance shifts entirely to multi-signature control until normal operations can resume. This approach provides several crucial benefits:

Security Feature Benefit
Multi-signature control Requires multiple authorized parties to approve transactions
Temporary centralization Enables rapid response to threats
Controlled decision-making Prevents malicious exploitation during vulnerabilities
Protocol stability Maintains system integrity during adverse events

The implementation of this security measure was highlighted when WLFI froze $107 million in tokens during a security incident, demonstrating the practical application of this governance mechanism. With WLFI currently ranking 42nd in market capitalization at $2.88 billion and a circulating supply of approximately 24.67 billion tokens, this governance structure helps protect substantial user assets across multiple blockchain networks including Ethereum, Solana, and BSC.

This governance model exemplifies how DeFi protocols can balance decentralization principles with necessary security controls to safeguard ecosystem stability.

EIP-7702 exploit leads to $750 million WLFI token theft

In a devastating security breach during 2025, hackers exploited a vulnerability in Ethereum's EIP-7702 upgrade to steal approximately $750 million worth of World Liberty Financial (WLFI) tokens. The sophisticated attack leveraged a phishing scheme that targeted the smart wallet feature introduced in the Pectra upgrade, allowing attackers to gain permission for moving tokens after obtaining victims' private keys.

Security expert Yu Xian identified the incident as a "classic EIP-7702 phishing exploit," explaining that once users funded their accounts with WLFI or deposited ETH for gas fees, automated sweeper bots instantly transferred all assets to the fraudsters' addresses. The attack was particularly effective due to its systematic execution across multiple blockchains.

Attack Metrics Details
Total Value Stolen $750 million
Affected Networks Ethereum, Solana, BSC
Primary Method Private key theft + EIP-7702 delegation
Token Price Impact -89% (from ATH $1.10 to $0.1168)

The incident highlighted critical security vulnerabilities in blockchain recruitment and Web3 talent acquisition, demonstrating how even high-profile projects remain susceptible to exploit. One victimized user reported successfully transferring 20% of their holdings before automated systems stole the remaining 80%, showcasing the competitive nature of these theft operations.

This security breach serves as a stark reminder of the importance of robust security protocols when handling digital assets, particularly during network upgrades when new vulnerabilities may emerge.

WLFI blacklists 269 wallets including major investor Sun Yuchen

In 2025, World Liberty Financial took dramatic action by blacklisting 269 wallets on its platform, with the most notable being a wallet associated with major investor Sun Yuchen. This controversial decision sent shockwaves through the crypto community as it effectively froze substantial token holdings. Sun's wallet contained an impressive 540 million unlocked tokens and 2.4 billion locked WLFI tokens, representing significant market value at the time.

The blacklisting occurred after blockchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence flagged suspicious activity, specifically a $9 million WLFI transfer from Sun's wallet that raised market manipulation concerns. The impact on WLFI's price was immediate and severe, with a 16% drop following these events.

Blacklisting Impact Details
Total wallets affected 269
Sun's unlocked tokens 540 million WLFI
Sun's locked tokens 2.4 billion WLFI
Price impact -16%
Transfer that triggered action $9 million

This incident highlights the tension between decentralization principles and the practical control mechanisms within crypto projects. Sun publicly claimed his tokens were "unreasonably" frozen, while WLFI defended its actions as necessary market protection. The situation demonstrates how even major DeFi protocols can implement centralized control when they perceive threats to token stability or project integrity.

FAQ

How much is a WLFI coin worth today?

As of November 5, 2025, WLFI coin is worth $0.1162, with a 5.89% increase in the last 24 hours.

Will WLFI tokens be worth anything?

Yes, WLFI tokens have potential value. The initial presale sold out quickly, indicating strong investor interest. Future worth will likely depend on the platform's success and market demand.

Is the WLFI coin real?

Yes, WLFI coin is a real cryptocurrency project. However, it's important to note that its legitimacy and value are debated in the crypto community.

Can I buy the WLFI coin?

Yes, you can buy WLFI coin. It's available for purchase using various payment methods. The coin is tradable on major cryptocurrency platforms.

* The information is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice or any other recommendation of any sort offered or endorsed by Gate.