【Blockchain Rhythm】The Ethereum Foundation has just announced an important adjustment—by 2026, the focus will shift from pursuing scalability speed to strengthening security defenses. Specifically, they have set a hard requirement: all zkEVM solutions must achieve 128-bit cryptographic security strength.
Sounds a bit strict? Indeed. Over the past year, zkEVM has made good progress in performance optimization, but issues have also emerged—some technical solutions are actually based on mathematical assumptions that have not been fully validated. Theoretically, this leaves potential vulnerabilities for on-chain state tampering.
Therefore, the foundation has decided to hit the brakes. Future efforts will focus on formal verification, attack resistance upgrades, and cryptographic security reinforcement. The foundation will also provide dedicated security review and assessment tools to help projects align with these new standards.
This adjustment will undoubtedly impact the progress of some scalability projects, and speed may be somewhat compromised. But the foundation’s logic is clear: rather than rushing for speed and risking endless problems, it’s better to solidify security first and then optimize performance. They believe that, in terms of institutional funding and high-value applications, attack resistance and trustworthiness are the most critical assets.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SandwichDetector
· 18h ago
128-bit, now those projects rushing to meet deadlines should be worried, but security really can't be taken lightly.
View OriginalReply0
0xLostKey
· 18h ago
Someone finally hit the brakes. I really couldn't stand how those projects were rushing blindly before.
However, the 128-bit threshold will block many imitation schemes. I'm a bit looking forward to the spectacle.
View OriginalReply0
TokenDustCollector
· 18h ago
Safety comes first, and I support this decision. The previous plans that prioritized speed at the expense of consequences should have been cleaned up long ago, or else trouble was bound to happen eventually.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketLightning
· 18h ago
Finally, someone is hitting the brakes. Those zkEVMs before were like driving a Russian sports car that couldn't be stopped at all.
Safety > Speed. What was bound to happen has finally happened again—a black swan.
How many scam projects will be eliminated by the 128-bit password strength threshold? Haha
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForMemes
· 18h ago
128-bit encryption security, to put it simply, is the foundation finally backing down, afraid of something going wrong.
Rapid iteration and security have always been a trade-off; this time, they chose security. As for those projects claiming to be revolutionary, we'll see.
Formal verification sounds impressive, but in reality, it's just about finding and fixing gaps. Why didn't they do it earlier?
View OriginalReply0
DarkPoolWatcher
· 18h ago
Speed and security, you have to choose one. This time, the priority has finally been clarified. However, those high-performance L2 solutions will probably need to readjust their roadmaps. The 128-bit encryption barrier is something everyone has to tough out.
Ethereum Foundation 2026 Shift: zkEVM Security Upgrade, 128-bit Encryption Becomes the New Baseline
【Blockchain Rhythm】The Ethereum Foundation has just announced an important adjustment—by 2026, the focus will shift from pursuing scalability speed to strengthening security defenses. Specifically, they have set a hard requirement: all zkEVM solutions must achieve 128-bit cryptographic security strength.
Sounds a bit strict? Indeed. Over the past year, zkEVM has made good progress in performance optimization, but issues have also emerged—some technical solutions are actually based on mathematical assumptions that have not been fully validated. Theoretically, this leaves potential vulnerabilities for on-chain state tampering.
Therefore, the foundation has decided to hit the brakes. Future efforts will focus on formal verification, attack resistance upgrades, and cryptographic security reinforcement. The foundation will also provide dedicated security review and assessment tools to help projects align with these new standards.
This adjustment will undoubtedly impact the progress of some scalability projects, and speed may be somewhat compromised. But the foundation’s logic is clear: rather than rushing for speed and risking endless problems, it’s better to solidify security first and then optimize performance. They believe that, in terms of institutional funding and high-value applications, attack resistance and trustworthiness are the most critical assets.