[Block Rhythm] Recently, a co-founder of a well-known mining pool shared a thought-provoking experience on social media. After discovering that his account might have fallen victim to phishing, resulting in the loss of 50 million USDT, he decided to conduct a bold security verification experiment.
To confirm whether the private key was truly compromised, he transferred 500 bitcoins to a suspected stolen address. The result shocked everyone— the hackers “only” took away 490 bitcoins, leaving him with a hard-earned 10.
Behind this seemingly humorous narrative lies the actual revelation of the vulnerability of private key security in the current blockchain ecosystem. A single misstep could result in the loss of tens of millions in assets. Ironically, the hackers' selective extraction behavior indicates that their actions are driven by clear intentions—they are precisely calculating and controlling risks.
This case serves as a reminder to all holders: protecting private keys is not just a technical issue, but a matter of survival. Regardless of the scale of assets, a single phishing attack or exposure of private keys can cause years of accumulation to vanish in an instant. For high-net-worth users, security measures such as cold wallet storage, multi-signature wallets, and hardware wallets are no longer optional, but essential.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BottomMisser
· 10h ago
Wow, the hacker even left him 10 Bitcoins? Is this mocking him? Haha
You really can't be careless with a private key; a single slip and it's gone.
This guy is really bold, directly transferring 500 BTC for verification... I couldn't do that.
It feels like security issues are harder than technical issues now; gotta be careful everywhere.
The hacker's precise risk calculation is really terrifying to think about; it shows they are professional.
We retail investors may have a lot of small amounts, but we still have to be cautious; otherwise, one day we might end up in debt.
View OriginalReply0
StakeWhisperer
· 11h ago
Damn, this guy must be tired of living, going fishing with 500 BTC...
What does it mean for the hacker to leave 10? Is he mocking him? Haha
A Private Key can lose tens of millions in a second, just thinking about it is terrifying.
That's why I absolutely refuse to use exchange Wallets, no matter how troublesome, I have to manage it myself.
If the big Mining Pool pros can crash, we retail investors need to be even more careful...
This news made me break out in a cold sweat, I immediately checked my Wallet.
What is the hacker's logic? Is he deliberately leaving money to prove he hacked him? That's crazy.
Really, one mistake and you're bankrupt, the rules of the crypto world are that cruel.
View OriginalReply0
ZkSnarker
· 11h ago
honestly, the "leaving 10 btc behind" detail is sending me... like did the hacker just go "eh close enough"? well technically that's not how this works but imagine if attackers just had mercy thresholds lmfao
Reply0
degenwhisperer
· 11h ago
Wow, the hacker even left 10 Bitcoins on purpose? What are they playing at...
Damn, we really need to take this seriously. Once the Private Key is exposed, it's game over.
Even the top Mining Pools can crash, we small investors need to be even more cautious.
This guy is really bold, directly transferring 500 BTC in to verify... that's some serious guts.
The hacker is selectively withdrawing, which shows they are precisely playing people for suckers, it's terrifying.
A moment's carelessness can lead to losses of tens of millions, that's the crypto world for you...
Cold Wallets are really not optional, they are a necessity.
The Cost of Private Key Leakage: A True Encounter of a Co-founder of a Leading Mining Pool
[Block Rhythm] Recently, a co-founder of a well-known mining pool shared a thought-provoking experience on social media. After discovering that his account might have fallen victim to phishing, resulting in the loss of 50 million USDT, he decided to conduct a bold security verification experiment.
To confirm whether the private key was truly compromised, he transferred 500 bitcoins to a suspected stolen address. The result shocked everyone— the hackers “only” took away 490 bitcoins, leaving him with a hard-earned 10.
Behind this seemingly humorous narrative lies the actual revelation of the vulnerability of private key security in the current blockchain ecosystem. A single misstep could result in the loss of tens of millions in assets. Ironically, the hackers' selective extraction behavior indicates that their actions are driven by clear intentions—they are precisely calculating and controlling risks.
This case serves as a reminder to all holders: protecting private keys is not just a technical issue, but a matter of survival. Regardless of the scale of assets, a single phishing attack or exposure of private keys can cause years of accumulation to vanish in an instant. For high-net-worth users, security measures such as cold wallet storage, multi-signature wallets, and hardware wallets are no longer optional, but essential.