The LIGHT project and PIPPIN seem to be following a similar path. To be honest, the development logic, token mechanism, and market positioning of the two coins all reveal similar shadows. The question is, is this design a coincidence or intentional? What the market needs is innovation, not just a rehashing of someone else's plan in a different guise. For LIGHT and PIPPIN to break through, they need to present truly differentiated offerings—whether it's technological breakthroughs, application scenarios, or ecosystem development. Merely sticking to one path is actually a waste for coin holders.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasGuzzler
· 9h ago
It's another trap of switching shells; coin holders really need to wake up.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-afe07a92
· 9h ago
Stop playing with things that are just shells, it's really annoying.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTherapist
· 9h ago
Another skin swap? LIGHT and PIPPIN are really just copying and pasting from each other, holders are Rekt.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetective
· 9h ago
It's the same old trick again, copying and pasting two projects, thinking they can play people for suckers just by changing the skin.
View OriginalReply0
DegenApeSurfer
· 9h ago
To be honest, LIGHT and PIPPIN are just rebranded versions of each other, the mechanisms are basically the same, isn't it a waste for coin holders to be held like this?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 9h ago
It's just the same old trap with a new twist; I really can't see any essential difference between the two projects.
The LIGHT project and PIPPIN seem to be following a similar path. To be honest, the development logic, token mechanism, and market positioning of the two coins all reveal similar shadows. The question is, is this design a coincidence or intentional? What the market needs is innovation, not just a rehashing of someone else's plan in a different guise. For LIGHT and PIPPIN to break through, they need to present truly differentiated offerings—whether it's technological breakthroughs, application scenarios, or ecosystem development. Merely sticking to one path is actually a waste for coin holders.