Some community members are pointing out that certain figures in the crypto space may be selectively sharing clips from longer discussions to shape narratives. They're highlighting that Bitcoin Archive, Pete Rizzo, and others have allegedly coordinated messaging around recent controversies. The suggestion is to review full context from sources like CoinDesk rather than relying on isolated snippets. There's been a response addressing these claims, though debate continues in the community about whether certain voices are operating in concert to influence public perception on key figures and events.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HallucinationGrower
· 6h ago
It's the same old trap, cutting off opinions to create public opinion; this circle is just like this.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a606bf0c
· 6h ago
These days, who isn't selectively sharing? It all comes down to who can shout the loudest to win.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketLightning
· 6h ago
This trap is too familiar, playing people for suckers with fragmented information and taking things out of context... this web3 thing just never ends.
Some community members are pointing out that certain figures in the crypto space may be selectively sharing clips from longer discussions to shape narratives. They're highlighting that Bitcoin Archive, Pete Rizzo, and others have allegedly coordinated messaging around recent controversies. The suggestion is to review full context from sources like CoinDesk rather than relying on isolated snippets. There's been a response addressing these claims, though debate continues in the community about whether certain voices are operating in concert to influence public perception on key figures and events.