The whole voting mechanism just feels a bit theatrical, if I'm being honest. It kinda reads like the outcome's already set in stone. But here's the thing—I'm not really worried about it because the team has proven they can deliver. They've brought us this far, and that's what actually matters.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ImpermanentLossFan
· 7h ago
The voting mechanism does resemble a performance to some extent, but what I care more about is whether the team can continue to deliver; after all, they haven't disappointed me so far.
View OriginalReply0
TokenSleuth
· 7h ago
The voting mechanism does have some flavor, but rather than getting tangled up in that, it’s better to look at the team’s delivery capability, as that is the hard metric.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaBrain
· 8h ago
Actionability is much more reliable than the voting process, anyway the team has always been able to deliver.
The whole voting mechanism just feels a bit theatrical, if I'm being honest. It kinda reads like the outcome's already set in stone. But here's the thing—I'm not really worried about it because the team has proven they can deliver. They've brought us this far, and that's what actually matters.