Why do creator tokens and hype-driven patronage models consistently underwhelm in crypto? Strip away the noise and it becomes obvious.
The uncomfortable truth: most buyers are just playing the greater fool game—banking on finding someone willing to pay more later. That's it. There's no other reason to hold these tokens.
What about flooding the supply chain with celebrity backing? Bring in mega-influencers, household names, massive social media followings—does it change the fundamentals? Not really. Without genuine utility or cash flow backing the asset, bigger names only temporarily inflate the narrative. The supply-side mechanics remain broken. You can't engineer demand through hype alone; eventually the music stops.
The real issue is structural: these tokens lack intrinsic value. Once the speculative momentum dies, holders are left holding the bag.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SlowLearnerWang
· 6h ago
Well, it all comes down to passing the buck, nothing new...
View OriginalReply0
FantasyGuardian
· 6h ago
It's all just talk, in the end, it's just a trick of passing the buck, not useful at all.
View OriginalReply0
LeverageAddict
· 6h ago
Ha, to put it simply, it's just a game of passing the parcel, nothing new.
---
The celebrity effect can't save something that has no value; it will collapse regardless.
---
That's why I never touch creator tokens anymore; it's pure gambling.
---
The supply side is broken; no amount of fans will change that... it's a systemic issue.
---
Without any underlying value support, relying solely on celebrities to hold it up? Wake up, everyone.
---
Once the air is all let out, the dumb buyers' eyes will be wide open.
---
Without real cash flow support, it's all just air trading.
---
It’s always like this... celebrity endorsements are fun for a moment, but in the end, it's all tears.
---
Structural defects, no matter how you package it, it's still a pit.
Why do creator tokens and hype-driven patronage models consistently underwhelm in crypto? Strip away the noise and it becomes obvious.
The uncomfortable truth: most buyers are just playing the greater fool game—banking on finding someone willing to pay more later. That's it. There's no other reason to hold these tokens.
What about flooding the supply chain with celebrity backing? Bring in mega-influencers, household names, massive social media followings—does it change the fundamentals? Not really. Without genuine utility or cash flow backing the asset, bigger names only temporarily inflate the narrative. The supply-side mechanics remain broken. You can't engineer demand through hype alone; eventually the music stops.
The real issue is structural: these tokens lack intrinsic value. Once the speculative momentum dies, holders are left holding the bag.