A sound deliberative process doesn't gloss over differences by forcing everyone into agreement. Instead, it genuinely empowers people to voice their perspectives, debate them openly, and ultimately cast their vote.

That's exactly what we're seeing when major central banks operate as true committees with visible dissents. Rather than presenting a unified front that masks disagreement, allowing committee members to document their differing views—and even vote against the consensus—actually strengthens credibility.

It's a reminder that the healthiest institutions aren't the ones that hide internal tensions. They're the ones confident enough to let diverse viewpoints coexist, clash, and compete in the open. Think about it: if every decision seems unanimous, something's probably off.