In the past month, central banks around the world have been taking frequent actions. The Bank of Japan raised interest rates in December, reaching a 30-year high—this is not an isolated incident but a signal of the global shift from easing to tightening.
According to the latest data from the OECD, the major economies around the world are nearing the end of interest rate cuts. The Federal Reserve is estimated to only cut rates twice more by the end of 2026, while the Eurozone and Canada have basically no room for rate cuts, and countries like Japan and the UK are gradually tightening. In other words, the era of low-cost funds that has been thriving over the past few years is coming to an end.
Returning to the performance of the crypto market and the stock market, this recent rebound looks good, but in this larger context, it is actually like "false prosperity." The tightening of global liquidity has become a foregone conclusion, and the overall market valuation will eventually adjust downward; a temporary rebound cannot change this long-term trend. Instead of chasing after the rise, it is better to moderately reduce positions during the rebound window.
The key is to have a sense of rhythm. It's not about cutting everything at once, but rather choosing based on your own sectors and gradually reducing risk positions in an orderly manner. Especially for those sectors that are already overvalued and have seen significant gains earlier, it is more important to consider reducing positions first. If you don't act now, and wait for the adjustment to come before passively cutting, the costs will be higher.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
4 Likes
Reward
4
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-00be86fc
· 5h ago
Ah, the term "虚火" is used perfectly, I just feel like this recent wave has a bit of emptiness.
Reducing positions in batches is indeed a task, cutting all at once is just gambling.
The era of liquidity is really coming to an end, closing all positions early can still save some pants.
The signal from the Bank of Japan reaching a 30-year high needs some pondering.
If you don't act on the high-valued zones now, it will be too late to cry later.
There's nothing wrong with that, no one listens to advice when chasing the price.
If this rebound is still greedy, it will be too late when the adjustment comes.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_broke
· 11h ago
Here comes the fake rebound to deceive people again, I’ve seen through it long ago.
To be honest, those who are reducing their positions now have already made a profit, while those who are still chasing will eventually suffer losses.
The era of low-cost capital is really over, this time is different.
It feels like everyone is betting on a shift from the Central Bank, but the tightening of Liquidity is unavoidable.
Reducing positions in batches is the way to go, you can't eat a fat man in one bite.
I dare not touch those zones that have surged earlier.
Once the fake fire is extinguished, it will still fall, and rather than betting on a rebound, it's better to protect the principal.
Looking at the OECD data, it's clear that there is basically no room for interest rate cuts, tightening is the main theme.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_huntress
· 12h ago
The term 'virtual fire' is brilliant, I was almost ready to enter a position and got trapped.
---
The rhythm of reducing positions is really on point, otherwise if it falls later, directly cutting loss would be painful.
---
Wait, has liquidity really tightened? I feel like the crypto world is still point shaving.
---
Now I understand why the recent rebound is so bizarre, it turns out to be a flash in the pan.
---
Hearing that it's a 30-year high sounds quite scary, should I go for a Rug Pull now?
---
Instead of chasing the price, it's better to reduce position, that's so true, I've already started to exit in batches.
---
Is this the last chance to enter a position, or is it safer to continue watching?
---
Choosing the right zone is crucial, can someone advise which ones should be cut first?
---
The Central Bank is tightening, it seems this wave really needs adjustment, what was earned before must be protected.
---
The era of easing is over, low-cost funds won't return anymore, it's a bit regretful no matter how you think about it.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a606bf0c
· 12h ago
The hype won't last long, it's definitely right to reduce the overvalued zone as soon as possible.
In the past month, central banks around the world have been taking frequent actions. The Bank of Japan raised interest rates in December, reaching a 30-year high—this is not an isolated incident but a signal of the global shift from easing to tightening.
According to the latest data from the OECD, the major economies around the world are nearing the end of interest rate cuts. The Federal Reserve is estimated to only cut rates twice more by the end of 2026, while the Eurozone and Canada have basically no room for rate cuts, and countries like Japan and the UK are gradually tightening. In other words, the era of low-cost funds that has been thriving over the past few years is coming to an end.
Returning to the performance of the crypto market and the stock market, this recent rebound looks good, but in this larger context, it is actually like "false prosperity." The tightening of global liquidity has become a foregone conclusion, and the overall market valuation will eventually adjust downward; a temporary rebound cannot change this long-term trend. Instead of chasing after the rise, it is better to moderately reduce positions during the rebound window.
The key is to have a sense of rhythm. It's not about cutting everything at once, but rather choosing based on your own sectors and gradually reducing risk positions in an orderly manner. Especially for those sectors that are already overvalued and have seen significant gains earlier, it is more important to consider reducing positions first. If you don't act now, and wait for the adjustment to come before passively cutting, the costs will be higher.