The reality of on-chain trading hit different once you zoom into actual numbers. When the dust settles, genuine traders moving real volume? Surprisingly thin. So the play becomes obvious—get your asset in front of the handful of players who actually move the needle on-chain. Quality over quantity.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DAOplomacy
· 18h ago
ngl, the liquidity concentration thing is just path dependency in action—historical precedent suggests this was always inevitable once you map the actual incentive structures out. arguably the real game theory problem here isn't even about *finding* the whales, it's stakeholder alignment at scale, which... remains non-trivial.
Reply0
ZenMiner
· 18h ago
The liquidity illusion is broken. Only a few people are actually doing the work, how do we deal with it?
View OriginalReply0
StealthMoon
· 18h ago
Ngl, it's really like this; there are only a handful of players with real volume on-chain, most of them are just air.
The reality of on-chain trading hit different once you zoom into actual numbers. When the dust settles, genuine traders moving real volume? Surprisingly thin. So the play becomes obvious—get your asset in front of the handful of players who actually move the needle on-chain. Quality over quantity.