The collapse of independence. For political goals and to reduce interest expenses, the White House is openly pressuring the Fed to accelerate interest rate cuts. Yet core inflation is still stuck at a high of 3%, which is not a simple economic game—this is a power play determining the flow of global funds in the coming years, and investors in the crypto market have already sensed the shift.
The real turning point lies in the selection of the Fed chairman. The two Kevins have become the final competitors, representing completely opposite future directions:
**Kevin Hassett** - The Dovish Choice As a former aide of Trump, his position is clear. If he is elected, the outcome is basically locked in: radical interest rate cuts and a continuous flow of liquidity into the market. For the crypto circle, this is a signal to enter party mode. With sufficient funds and an increased risk appetite, everything can rise.
**Kevin Warsh** - The Contradiction of Reformist Wall Street elites and people in Trump's circle. On the surface, they may cooperate with interest rate cuts, but behind the scenes, they might initiate aggressive balance sheet reduction (QT). In other words: weaning the market off. The massive liquidity infusion in recent years will have to undergo surgery, and the pain is unavoidable.
The outcome of the game determines everything. The 9:3 voting split within the Fed is just the tip of the iceberg; the real uncertainty lies in the fact that, no matter who wins, the market will question whether they have succumbed to political pressure.
In the coming days, don't just focus on economic data. The power games in Washington are the script you need to interpret. If the monetary easing faction comes to power, a liquidity feast may boost all assets; if the reformists take the stage, then it's a cash is king, wait for the bottoming rhythm.
What do you think? Which of the two Kevins will laugh last? Is your investment strategy prepared for these two possible futures? Share your thoughts in the comments.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FlatlineTrader
· 9m ago
Hassett can only take off in the crypto world, and Walsh is just putting on a Be Played for Suckers tutorial for everyone.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBard
· 16h ago
Hassett is coming in with pump-priming, and then DOGE is going to da moon, I'm betting on it.
---
This guy Walsh is really ruthless, at the start of QT everyone has to cut loss, are you ready for rekt?
---
In simple terms, it's a gamble on politics; economic data doesn't matter at all, just watch how that group in Washington plays the game.
---
I don't trust either of the Kevins, in the end, the market decides, it's all about the Bull vs Bear Battle now.
---
When the liquidity feast comes, I’m all in; if it doesn’t happen, I’ll just hide in cash, there will always be opportunities.
---
Core inflation at 3% and still want to cut interest rates? This logic is just insane; someone must be compromising for political purposes.
---
If this wave in the crypto world really depends on who takes the reins, it would be doomed if not for Hassett.
View OriginalReply0
MoonWaterDroplets
· 16h ago
I'll go all in if Hasset takes the lead; as for Walsh's words, it's better to hold cash for now.
View OriginalReply0
UncommonNPC
· 16h ago
If Hassett wins, I'll go all in directly. If Walsh really dares to QT, then I'll just cash out and lie flat.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 16h ago
If Hassett takes office, I'm all in; if Walsh comes, I'll stock up on stablecoins.
#美国就业数据表现强劲超出预期 🔥The battle for the helm of the Fed: How will liquidity policy rewrite your Wallet story?
$DOGE $ETH
The collapse of independence. For political goals and to reduce interest expenses, the White House is openly pressuring the Fed to accelerate interest rate cuts. Yet core inflation is still stuck at a high of 3%, which is not a simple economic game—this is a power play determining the flow of global funds in the coming years, and investors in the crypto market have already sensed the shift.
The real turning point lies in the selection of the Fed chairman. The two Kevins have become the final competitors, representing completely opposite future directions:
**Kevin Hassett** - The Dovish Choice
As a former aide of Trump, his position is clear. If he is elected, the outcome is basically locked in: radical interest rate cuts and a continuous flow of liquidity into the market. For the crypto circle, this is a signal to enter party mode. With sufficient funds and an increased risk appetite, everything can rise.
**Kevin Warsh** - The Contradiction of Reformist
Wall Street elites and people in Trump's circle. On the surface, they may cooperate with interest rate cuts, but behind the scenes, they might initiate aggressive balance sheet reduction (QT). In other words: weaning the market off. The massive liquidity infusion in recent years will have to undergo surgery, and the pain is unavoidable.
The outcome of the game determines everything. The 9:3 voting split within the Fed is just the tip of the iceberg; the real uncertainty lies in the fact that, no matter who wins, the market will question whether they have succumbed to political pressure.
In the coming days, don't just focus on economic data. The power games in Washington are the script you need to interpret. If the monetary easing faction comes to power, a liquidity feast may boost all assets; if the reformists take the stage, then it's a cash is king, wait for the bottoming rhythm.
What do you think? Which of the two Kevins will laugh last? Is your investment strategy prepared for these two possible futures? Share your thoughts in the comments.