Recently, I noticed a significant piece of news: Charles Schwab announced the launch of SOL futures trading. At first glance, it seems like just a regular product launch, but if you carefully analyze the underlying logic, you'll find that this could be a key turnaround for TradFi towards the encryption world.



First, let's talk about the scale of Charles Schwab. As a top Wall Street institution managing trillions of dollars in assets, every move of this company undergoes strict compliance verification and risk assessment. They do not casually enter a certain field, especially in relatively emerging areas like encryption assets. The selection of SOL indicates what? It indicates that this public chain has already gained sufficient asset attribute recognition in the eyes of traditional financial giants.

The true value of this matter lies in breaking down an invisible wall. Previously, many large institutions wanted to enter the encryption market, but the biggest obstacle was not technology or interest, but the lack of "compliance channels." Now, the entry of licensed institutions like Charles Schwab essentially paves an official channel for subsequent funds. Those institutional investors managing hundreds of billions or even trillions of assets could only observe due to compliance issues, but now, with such pioneers as endorsements, the cost and risk perception of entering the market have significantly decreased.

From the perspective of market liquidity, what does this mean? It means that the encryption market may welcome a wave of "institutional-level fresh funds." This is different from the scattered inflows of retail funds; institutional funds are often large in volume, long in cycle, and strong in stability, which can profoundly change the supply and demand pattern of the entire market.

Some may say that other giants have previously made moves in encryption, but the results were not as aggressive as imagined. This observation is valid, but the key point is that the environment has changed. As more licensed financial institutions begin to layout simultaneously, this is no longer a trial action by a single institution, but rather the formation of an industry consensus. This consensus will attract more peers to follow suit, creating a positive feedback loop.

From a different perspective, this move by Charles Schwab also reflects their judgment on the long-term stability of the SOL ecosystem. Being selected as a futures underlying asset by traditional financial institutions indicates that SOL has reached the entry standards for institutional investment across multiple dimensions—technical maturity, ecosystem development, and controllable risks.

Overall, this could be an important milestone in the fusion process of TradFi and encryption assets. It's not just a positive sign for SOL, but a signal for the entire encryption market moving towards institutionalization and standardization.
SOL0.96%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
InscriptionGrillervip
· 4h ago
Charles Schwab's move is ruthless; to put it bluntly, it's just TradFi starting to harvest suckers with a new scythe. SOL being chosen is not because of amazing technology, but because it's cheap.
View OriginalReply0
ForkPrincevip
· 4h ago
The move by Charles Schwab means that the compliance channel has been opened, and institutions are really coming.
View OriginalReply0
BTCBeliefStationvip
· 4h ago
Wall Street is finally coming in, SOL should be stable this time, right?
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropBrovip
· 4h ago
Wow, the big shots from Wall Street have really arrived, SOL is definitely stable this time.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)