Latest reports show that massive headcount reductions haven't translated into any actual savings. Despite sweeping workforce cuts, the operation still missed its key spending reduction goals—raising questions about whether the structural changes are delivering real results or just reshuffling the deck. The numbers tell an interesting story: aggressive personnel reductions typically signal major operational overhauls, yet the financial outcomes remain flat. It's a classic case where layoffs and restructuring don't automatically fix underlying systemic inefficiencies. This scenario sparks broader debate in policy circles: are aggressive cuts the right lever, or does real cost control require a different approach? Worth watching how this plays out and what adjustments come next.