2025-12-22 04:20:12

Recently, I have spent a lot of effort digging into the progress of MemeMax's Phase 2, and I'm particularly eager to clarify where this money comes from and how long it can last.

After整理 the materials, I want to share some key findings. The focus is still on the actual income situation of the protocol itself.

**The situation on the financing side**

In March, the MemeCore Foundation announced that it had secured financing, backed by a number of well-known institutions—IBC Group, Waterdrip Capital, AC Capital, and Catcher have all invested. The background of this financing is worth examining, as it can help us understand the project's future development potential and financial support.

M2.82%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVvictim

· 2h ago

I just want to know how long this money can last, it's all old faces investing... --- With institutions like IBC and Waterdrip coming in, will the subsequent financing story be even more fierce? --- Alright, it's another financing news, but what we really need to look at is the real income data. --- It feels like these institutional endorsements are just to pave the way for future valuations; real income is the key. --- How long will the money from Phase 2 last for them? That's what I'm most concerned about. --- So, to put it bluntly, it still depends on how much the protocol itself can earn; financing is just paper numbers. --- Is this again? Institutional investors + financing news, it's always the same routine...

View OriginalReply0

DustCollector

· 2h ago

It hurts, it's the same few institutions again, can they be reliable this time? The real money still depends on how much fee the protocol can absorb. No matter how luxurious the background of the financing party is, in the end, we still have to let the data speak. How long this Phase 2 can last mainly depends on how well the token economics are designed. I feel a bit confident about IBC and Waterdrip getting on board, but we need to guard against being played for suckers. Having more money is not necessarily a good thing; the key is how to spend it.

View OriginalReply0

MeaninglessGwei

· 2h ago

These institutional endorsements are indeed impressive, but the real truth is whether they can actually make money. To put it bluntly, financing is just buying time; the key still depends on how much real profit the protocol itself can generate. It's not enough for all those VCs in IBC to just throw money; we need to see if the team can actually deliver. With so many people watching Phase 2, the question is whether it can be profitable. Financing looks good, but can this model really work? It's just another round of financing after financing; when can we see actual revenue data? It feels like everyone is talking about the financing background while the details of revenue are being neglected.

View OriginalReply0

GasOptimizer

· 2h ago

Forget it, I'm more concerned about the protocol's real income than the financing background... Those institutional endorsements are just stories about the funding side, the key is what the on-chain data says.

View OriginalReply0

CexIsBad

· 2h ago

This financing background looks glamorous, but making real money is the key. Where the money comes from is not important; the key issue is how long it will burn. It's the same old institutional endorsement; can we stop exaggerating so much? Phase 2 sounds good, but how much real cash can the protocol itself generate? I know about institutions like IBC and Waterdrip, but whether this time is reliable still depends on what follows. Where are the real income data? Don't just talk about the financing amount.

View OriginalReply0

GoldDiggerDuck

· 2h ago

The list of financing parties looks impressive, but the key is to see where the money is actually going. MemeMax has a good background in this round of financing, but we still need to look at the revenue data; having institutional backing alone is not enough. The bets from IBC and Waterdrip indicate that there are still people inside who believe in it; it remains to be seen if Phase 2 can really be implemented. No matter how luxurious the financing parties are, ultimately, it comes down to whether the protocol itself can make money; that's the hard indicator. What these types of projects fear the most is that after the financing halo fades, there is no real income. MemeMax needs to be followed closely.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsDetective

· 3h ago

Where the money comes from isn't important; the key is to see how much the protocol itself can earn. It's a bit questionable that MemeMax has raised so much; has the ecological real income kept up? The financing parties are so strong, which shows the project party has some substance... or are they just raising funds? Let's observe for now and wait for the real data from Phase 2 to come out before commenting. It's again those institutions like IBC and Waterdrip; the projects they invest in generally have mediocre luck. No matter how large the financing amount is, it doesn't matter if the real income from the protocol can't support it. Phase 2 needs to really take off to be worth paying attention to; otherwise, it's just the old story of price turns lower after positive open. This round of financing is indeed quite substantial, but there are too many variables in the meme track.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#2025GateYearEndSummary
38.58K Popularity
#CryptoMarketMildlyRebounds
2.23K Popularity
#GoldPrintsNewATH
721 Popularity
#BOJRateHikesBackontheTable
439 Popularity
#2026CryptoOutlook
563 Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
DogdDogd
MC:$3.57KHolders:1
0.00%
2
07860786
MC:$3.65KHolders:2
0.14%
3
wlwife less
MC:$3.54KHolders:1
0.00%
4
oxSunoxSun
MC:$3.56KHolders:1
0.00%
5
GSNOWGate Snow
MC:$3.56KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap