So here's the thing about government spending initiatives—when you announce massive workforce cuts and efficiency measures, people expect to see actual results, right? But looking at the numbers, the latest update on DOGE's budget reduction efforts shows workforce layoffs but pretty much zero savings so far. That's a head-scratcher. You'd think eliminating positions would automatically trim the fat, but apparently hitting those spending targets is harder than the pitch made it sound. Plenty of questions about whether the approach actually works or if there's something off with how things are being measured. Either way, it's becoming a case study in whether aggressive restructuring actually delivers on its promises.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MissedAirdropAgainvip
· 9h ago
So many people have been laid off, yet there's no savings? Where's the promised efficiency? This logic just doesn't make sense.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofGremlinvip
· 9h ago
The fact that layoffs have no effect shows that just cutting people is not enough; we really need to change the processes.
View OriginalReply0
DeadTrades_Walkingvip
· 10h ago
Laid off staff but still say no money was saved? How does this logic not add up? It feels like there is something wrong with the numbers.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractWorkervip
· 10h ago
Half a day of layoffs and still no savings? This is ridiculous... What happened to efficiency?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)