2025-12-22 09:01:56

There's a pretty interesting case to discuss — an AI auto-trading Open Source project called Nofx, which received nearly 9,000 stars on GitHub in just two months, with a rise speed that's outrageous. It sounds like a hit, but what happened? One controversy after another.

The story of this project sounds like a TV series. Shortly after the project became popular, security issues surfaced. According to reports, Nofx has serious vulnerabilities that could be exploited by hackers, posing risks—this was the first wave of impact. As a result, the code wasn't even finished being fixed when internal conflicts erupted. Team members got into disputes over equity distribution, pointing fingers at each other, creating maximum drama.

Ironically, shortly after, issues regarding the Open Source license arose. This is not a minor friction, but a significant matter concerning the legal nature and usage rights of the entire project. The open source community has differing opinions on this, leading to a flurry of discussions, and the project's credibility has plummeted.

The interesting thing about this matter is that it exposes the common problems of many emerging Open Source projects: a rise too fast can become a hazard. When a project suddenly becomes popular, it often means that - quality review may not keep up, team management may not keep up, and legal compliance is even neglected. Nofx's experience is a living example.

For developers and users who want to participate in such projects, this is also a wake-up call. No matter how popular a project is, if there are problems in the foundational aspects like security, governance, and protocols, it can easily evolve into a systemic crisis. Just look at Nofx, which went from being highly anticipated to embroiled in controversy in just two months. Conversely, rebuilding trust will also be very difficult.

The open-source world emphasizes transparency and community collaboration, but the prerequisite is to have solid fundamentals. The story of Nofx tells us that the hype is far less important than a solid security foundation and a clear governance framework.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-0717ab66

· 2025-12-25 08:23

9000 stars in two months? That’s an incredible level of popularity. But then a bunch of crap followed one after another, it cracked me up. --- Another story of a "hot project crashing," I’m tired of this routine... --- Basically, it’s greed for quick success. They didn’t do any foundational work and just wanted to go viral. And now? Full of bugs and disputes. --- After so many years, the open-source community is still making the same mistakes. Truly unlearnable. --- Nofx’s move is a textbook example of a negative case. Make a note of it. --- Thinking of those projects that went viral overnight, they mostly didn’t end well... This one just blew up in two months. --- Security issues have already been exposed, and some still dare to use it? This project is doomed. --- Equity disputes + agreement issues + security vulnerabilities—triple blow. How fragile must it be?

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractRebel

· 2025-12-23 21:02

9000star in two months? I knew it would be another "rapid collapse" script... security vulnerabilities, equity disputes, protocol issues, a triple whammy. That's why I never blindly follow popular projects; too many "blockbusters" are just hastily built shoddy constructions. Nofx's incident has exposed the common illness in the open source community — rapid rise is not necessarily a good thing, and it's actually the easiest way to crash. It still depends on whether the infrastructure is solid; otherwise, no matter how many stars you have, it’s all in vain.

View OriginalReply0

HalfIsEmpty

· 2025-12-22 09:31

It’s the same old trap, burning bright but dying just as quickly. 9000 stars in two months, vulnerabilities, infighting, and protocols all come around once, to put it bluntly, they haven’t done their basic work and want to ride the wave. --- Nofx is a textbook example of what not to do, don’t blindly follow projects that are suddenly popular. --- Seriously, security is the top priority for Open Source projects, any governance documents must pass inspection, otherwise, you’re just gifting hackers. --- These guys are really going at it, once the equity disputes start, there’s no saving it. --- Two months from god to ghost, restoring trust will indeed take several times longer. I’m directly passing on this type of project. --- To be honest, most of those projects on GitHub that are quickly gaining stars are likely just bubbles, and Nofx was just caught. --- If you can’t even figure out the Open Source protocol, how dare you go Open Source? That’s just ridiculous.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwichMaker

· 2025-12-22 09:29

This is a typical case of "rushing in", with security, governance, and legal aspects only thought of later? I've long been tired of this Nofx situation; nine out of ten popular projects on GitHub are like this. By the way, are those early birds all trapped now? Falling from grace in two months, that slap in the face is quite loud... the open source community will have to remember this time. It's another "the faster the growth, the more bugs" textbook example. We all say safety first, but when it comes to actual implementation, it's always the logistics team, which is truly absurd. After so many years in open source projects, the scariest thing is this kind of overnight fame followed by disaster... it's better to be steady and reliable. So out of these 9000 Stars, how many actually realized this isn't a gold mine?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedDreams

· 2025-12-22 09:28

9000 stars in two months? Laughing to death, this is a typical example of web3 frozen dumplings, freezing fast and thawing fast. Internal strife, security vulnerabilities, protocol disputes... After a set of combo punches, trust collapses directly, this is the real rug pull. The GitHub popularity leaderboard has always been a mirror to reveal the truth; the higher the project climbs, the more cautious you need to be, as they basically haven't solidified their foundation. The open source community is now like this, whoever runs fast wins, but if they go too fast, it becomes a time bomb; Nofx is a counterexample. So, when looking at projects, don't just look at popularity; the governance and security behind them are the lifeblood.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainGriller

· 2025-12-22 09:09

9000 stars crashed after two months, to put it bluntly, it's still the team that didn't understand what they were doing There are vulnerabilities, equity disputes, and protocol issues, this rhythm... laughable Projects that gain popularity quickly also fade quickly, I've seen this pattern in the open source community too many times Projects that rely on hype will eventually pay the tuition, Nofx is a living textbook

View OriginalReply0