#BTC对标贵金属的竞争格局 $BEAT This target, my strategy is very simple - small amounts to test the waters and then run, I never planned to hold on stubbornly. Things like funding fees are invisible costs for most retail investors, and they are the culprits that eat away at profits. Rather than being slowly worn down by holding fees, it’s better to enter and exit quickly and take profits when possible. The crypto world is never short of opportunities, but many people stubbornly hold onto one type of coin and end up being drained by fees. This approach actually applies to other highly volatile coins as well - controlling positions, managing costs, and taking profits in a timely manner is more important than anything else.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasGuru
· 12-22 15:30
The funding fee is really a silent way to play people for suckers, I've seen too many people stubbornly holding on until they get drained to zero. The key is to enter and exit quickly.
Retail investors should learn to run and not fantasize about going all in to get rich.
Fees can be draining, it's better to switch between a few assets, there are plenty of opportunities out there.
For something like BEAT, I just tested the waters and pulled out, no need to go against the money.
The biggest enemy in the crypto world is actually one's own greed, and the second biggest is the funding fee.
Small positions and more trades are much better than slowly dying while holding onto just one coin.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomMiner
· 12-22 15:26
The funding rate is really a killer for retail investors. I only understood this principle after suffering some losses.
To put it simply, don’t stubbornly hold onto coins; there are plenty of opportunities, but fees can slowly drain you.
I didn’t plan to hold onto BEAT for long either; once I got in, I was thinking about when to exit. That’s the correct way to play with this stuff.
In the crypto world, it’s always like this; greedy people end up being killed by the rates.
The strategy of quick entry and exit is a lifesaver for me, but many people don’t believe it.
Fees are really hard to guard against; you still need to have an exit plan.
View OriginalReply0
BrokeBeans
· 12-22 15:26
Funding fees are indeed an invisible killer, I've seen too many people get drained like this.
#BTC对标贵金属的竞争格局 $BEAT This target, my strategy is very simple - small amounts to test the waters and then run, I never planned to hold on stubbornly. Things like funding fees are invisible costs for most retail investors, and they are the culprits that eat away at profits. Rather than being slowly worn down by holding fees, it’s better to enter and exit quickly and take profits when possible. The crypto world is never short of opportunities, but many people stubbornly hold onto one type of coin and end up being drained by fees. This approach actually applies to other highly volatile coins as well - controlling positions, managing costs, and taking profits in a timely manner is more important than anything else.