#数字资产市场洞察 Epic Chain ($EPIC) has recently made a noteworthy turn - from initially creating star NFTs on Ethernity Chain, it has now transformed into a new force in ETH Layer 2, focusing on the two major tracks of entertainment and RWA. With Ripple's technological backing, this combination is quite interesting.



There are many highlights on the technical level: zero-knowledge proofs protect privacy, EVM compatibility with nearly zero Gas fees, and over 3000 TPS supporting second-level confirmations. This configuration is indeed very friendly for NFT minting and fan interaction scenarios.

From a trading perspective, there are some signals worth pondering - supporting 1:1 coin swaps, USDT trading pair liquidity is stable, with a growth of 5.42% over the past week. Interestingly, the proportion of long-term addresses holding positions for over 180 days has reached 68%, indicating that the consensus foundation is quite solid.

What do you think about this dual track layout of entertainment + RWA? If there is a pullback, is such a project configuration worth following?
EPIC25.6%
ETH0.03%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketNoodlervip
· 7h ago
Transitioning from NFT star projects to Layer 2, this operation indeed has some substance. However, Ripple's endorsement sounds good, but the key is whether the ecosystem can truly take off; having beautiful technical data alone is not useful.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-beba108dvip
· 8h ago
The operation of EPIC is indeed a bit fierce, with Ripple backing and the Layer 2 track, a 68% long position ratio is not to be taken lightly. Wait, how did we jump from NFT directly to RWA? This shift is a bit fast, isn't it? However, the entertainment sector does tend to produce hits easily. Gas fees are nearly zero? That's a bit exaggerated, but it is indeed much cheaper than the Mainnet. With a 5.42% rise, let's wait and see if it can break a new high before entering a position. If this configuration really works, it could definitely be a dark horse, but there have been many Web3 projects that have failed, so it's better to be cautious. The stability of USDT liquidity is quite crucial, at least getting in and out isn't that painful. Entertainment + RWA sounds very sexy, but whether it can be realized still depends on the follow-up developments.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHighvip
· 8h ago
The endorsement of Ripple does have a bit of flavor, but it depends on whether it can really land in the future. 68% long-term holdings sound quite solid, but the entertainment sector has always been a bit precarious, easily fizzling out after the hype. I've long been tired of the gimmick of near-zero gas fees; the key is whether there are real users in the ecosystem. In terms of pullback, I actually want to see the real trading volume; a 5.42% rise with such fluctuation is not enough to explain the issue. The dual-track sounds nice, but in reality, it depends on who can truly create applications; otherwise, it's just a castle in the air.
View OriginalReply0
VirtualRichDreamvip
· 8h ago
Hey, I'm actually a bit interested in this Ripple-backed thing, but 68% long-term holdings seem a bit too perfect, right? --- From NFT to Layer2, this transition feels a bit rushed, I'm afraid there's no money to be made ahead --- Gas fees being close to zero sounds great, but I'm worried that the liquidity might just disappear --- A 5.42% rise isn't very impressive; I don't see any special signals here --- There's a lot of hype around RWA, but how many can really be put into practice? It feels like concept speculation again --- 180 days of holding 68%? Is this true belief or just locked up? We need to be clear --- The entertainment sector has been hyped a lot these past two years; why would Epic Chain be able to break through? --- EVM compatibility + second-level confirmation sounds nice, but other Layer2s are pretty much the same --- Ripple backing is a plus, but why does this name sound more and more like an altcoin project?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizardvip
· 8h ago
ngl the 68% long-term holder ratio is statistically significant here... actually makes the 5.42% pump look less like hype and more like organic accumulation, theoretically speaking. ripple backing doesn't hurt either but let's not pretend that's a substitute for actual tps performance lol
Reply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)