High-profile figures are increasingly questioning excessive executive compensation packages in large corporations. A recent statement highlighted concerns about defense sector leadership earning upwards of $50 million annually while simultaneously engaging in stock buyback programs and dividend distributions. The critique centers on whether such capital allocation strategies genuinely serve shareholder interests or primarily benefit upper management—a debate with echoes in how crypto protocols and DAOs structure incentive mechanisms.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropDreamer
· 6h ago
To be honest, I'm tired of the TradFi methods of playing people for suckers. Now they want to copy it in Web3? Laughable.
View OriginalReply0
ForkYouPayMe
· 12-23 02:51
ngl this is just the old trick of TradFi, executives playing people for suckers in a mining style... at least on the crypto side, there's still governance voting to balance things, which is much more transparent than these people.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysQuestioning
· 12-23 02:43
To be honest, this trap is also played extremely well in web3...
High-profile figures are increasingly questioning excessive executive compensation packages in large corporations. A recent statement highlighted concerns about defense sector leadership earning upwards of $50 million annually while simultaneously engaging in stock buyback programs and dividend distributions. The critique centers on whether such capital allocation strategies genuinely serve shareholder interests or primarily benefit upper management—a debate with echoes in how crypto protocols and DAOs structure incentive mechanisms.