Recently, the equity dispute involving AAVE is worth following, especially for CAKE players. CAKE will inevitably face similar issues, which are expected to possibly erupt as soon as next year, depending on when the oracle function starts charging.

The seemingly simple question is actually very complex. Although the oracle involves a well-known laboratory, CAKE is independently incubated and operated on the Binance Smart Chain. Here comes the key point — in terms of equity, CAKE and the oracle function are completely unrelated. This raises a sharp question: does the project party engage in profit transfer?

From a realistic perspective, CAKE incurs traffic and labor costs, which are borne by the DAO. But what does the DAO gain? Currently, it seems to be nothing. In contrast, Binance Smart Chain has profited significantly in this ecosystem. This unequal distribution of costs has naturally become the trigger.

Of course, the data is still insufficient at the moment, so the real answer won't be clear until the charging mechanism starts next year—how the oracle's revenue is distributed and how much the DAO can get, that's the core issue.