History shows us something pretty stark: societies that thrive are the ones willing to cross-pollinate ideas and keep their doors open to innovation. Athens, Baghdad—they didn't peak by locking down orthodoxy. They exploded with creativity and influence precisely because they were hubs where different thinking could mix and evolve. The moment a civilization stops borrowing, stops blending, stops questioning? That's when the decline starts. It's the same logic we see playing out today in digital ecosystems. The ones winning? They're built on radical openness—where ideas can flow freely, where thought diversity isn't a bug, it's the whole point. The ones fading? Usually the ones that calcified around old ways. Johan Norberg's work traces this beautifully through history: openness to trade and intellectual exchange as the engine of human flourishing. Worth thinking about as we build the next chapter of digital civilization.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugPullProphet
· 12-23 03:59
You're right, openness leads to progress, but the reality is that most on-chain projects are still plagiarizing each other and engaging in internal competition.
View OriginalReply0
DegenApeSurfer
· 12-23 03:55
That's right, Web3 here is a living example. Those projects that cling to a single narrative have basically been doomed, while the more open and inclusive ecosystems have grown wildly. Openness is the way to go.
View OriginalReply0
0xOverleveraged
· 12-23 03:49
It's really not the case; in the web3 space, many people are still clinging to their own little piece of land and completely fail to understand that openness is the way forward. Look at those projects that are truly making progress; which one of them isn't inclusive and accommodating...
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterNoLoss
· 12-23 03:45
Open vs closed, this logic is completely applicable on-chain as well. Look at those public chains with dead ecosystems, which one is not due to excessive centralized control.
History shows us something pretty stark: societies that thrive are the ones willing to cross-pollinate ideas and keep their doors open to innovation. Athens, Baghdad—they didn't peak by locking down orthodoxy. They exploded with creativity and influence precisely because they were hubs where different thinking could mix and evolve. The moment a civilization stops borrowing, stops blending, stops questioning? That's when the decline starts. It's the same logic we see playing out today in digital ecosystems. The ones winning? They're built on radical openness—where ideas can flow freely, where thought diversity isn't a bug, it's the whole point. The ones fading? Usually the ones that calcified around old ways. Johan Norberg's work traces this beautifully through history: openness to trade and intellectual exchange as the engine of human flourishing. Worth thinking about as we build the next chapter of digital civilization.