Let me ask this straight up: where's the logic in labeling someone an insider when everything's on the blockchain? Their main wallet is traceable, the connected accounts are all visible, and you can literally watch their holdings sync with whatever they're posting about. So if transparency is the baseline, what actually makes someone an insider? The whole thing seems backwards.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHarvester
· 12-23 10:49
Haha, this logic is indeed reversed. With on-chain transparency, what insider information can we talk about...
View OriginalReply0
FadCatcher
· 12-23 10:34
That being said, you can see everything on the blockchain, so what’s the point of playing insider tricks?
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_ptsd
· 12-23 10:26
On-chain full transparency is still called insider? This logic is really breaking down.
Let me ask this straight up: where's the logic in labeling someone an insider when everything's on the blockchain? Their main wallet is traceable, the connected accounts are all visible, and you can literally watch their holdings sync with whatever they're posting about. So if transparency is the baseline, what actually makes someone an insider? The whole thing seems backwards.