2025-12-23 11:26:09

Recently, there is a phenomenon worth following—projects like $ZKP have seen a rise of over 65% recently, and many early investors have indeed made considerable profits.

This reflects an interesting change. In an era where projects in the cryptocurrency space are emerging one after another, the real pain point for investors is information overload—it's not easy to find truly promising candidates among the vast number of projects. Some leading exchanges have started to curate "project selections," using the expertise of professional teams to conduct initial screenings for users, picking out projects that have fundamental support from among many candidates.

This logic is actually very simple: the reputation of the exchange and user stickiness are directly tied to the quality of the projects. Therefore, they are relatively cautious in their selection criteria, which invisibly reduces the probability of ordinary investors "stepping on a landmine." When this screening mechanism does filter out projects like $ZKP, the wealth effect becomes apparent.

Of course, no filtering is 100% effective, and there are always risks in the market. But the emergence of this mechanism itself indicates that the industry is gradually moving towards greater maturity and regulation.

ZKP13,28%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GamefiHarvester

· 12-24 20:18

A 65% increase isn't much; the real question is whether we can find it again next time. Exchange selection? Honestly, it's still a gambler's mentality. The pitfalls will always be there; the key is whether you've made money or not. Early adopters are laughing to death; we can only pick up the pieces. Can we hold until dawn this time? Information overload is really heartbreaking; who can teach me how to choose? Wait, do exchanges really have our best interests at heart? The increase is impressive, but making a move is what really counts. I don't trust any filters, only the candlestick charts. Another round of wealth transfer, we're always late to the party.

View OriginalReply0

TaxEvader

· 12-23 11:58

A 65% rise sounds good, but who can guarantee that the next one is ZKP? The selection of exchanges? To put it bluntly, it's still for their own reputation, don't think of them as too selfless. Those who positioned early made a profit, but what about those who came in later... that's the fate of the crypto world. Selected projects sound impressive, but in reality, you still have to do your own homework; exchanges can also crash. The industry is mature? I think it's still quite early; let's talk when it’s truly transparent. This wave of ZKP is indeed envy-inducing, but I still believe in the old saying – a flying pig will eventually fall.

View OriginalReply0

BitcoinDaddy

· 12-23 11:47

65% rise? You should have entered a position earlier --- Selected by the exchange? To put it bluntly, it’s just helping us step into the pit --- This wave of ZKP is real, I know someone who's made a fortune --- In this era of information explosion, the ability to filter is indeed valuable --- Wait a minute, isn’t this logic a bit too perfect... what about the risks? --- Selected projects sound appealing, but don’t forget that exchanges also need to make money --- Those who laid out early made profits, can those who enter now still catch up? --- The maturity of the industry has been talked about for years, yet those that drop to zero still drop to zero --- Wow, ZKP is rising so fast, how come I didn't follow it --- Is the filtering mechanism reliable? I still feel like it's just luck --- Once the wealth effect appears, it’s time to run, don’t get played for suckers

View OriginalReply0

UncommonNPC

· 12-23 11:30

65%? That's a bit outrageous, isn't it? Is someone blowing things out of proportion again? Is it really reliable just because the exchange has selected it? To put it bluntly, it's still all about the interests being tied together. It's certainly nice for those who got in early, but what about those who are catching a falling knife now? I've heard this set of arguments too many times, be careful not to become suckers. No matter how cautious the screening mechanism is, risks are always there, don't be brainwashed by the word "regulation." I haven't followed ZKP, but this phenomenon happens every week. The problem is, how can ordinary people know which ones are truly good projects? The exchange helps you filter? Ha, they make money first and then talk.

View OriginalReply0