2025-12-23 13:25:16

Seeing some people comment on encryption projects always using the past to speak, it's really a bit powerless to retort.

For example, looking at a leading DEX project, I admit that based on historical data: it hasn't really risen much over the years, especially during bear markets. But this logic is flawed—what's the point of only focusing on the timeline? The key is what the data itself is saying.

Looking at the income for October this year, it's 160 million for one month, while the entire year of 2023 was only 120 million. Are you telling me that history has no prospects? Isn't that just talking nonsense? Comparing past annual data to current monthly data, what conclusion can we draw? Clearly, this project is improving.

Some people are still talking about ZEC. Privacy coins have indeed not exploded for a long time, but just because there hasn't been a market in the past, does that mean there will never be a market? This logic does not hold in any industry.

Whether you can make money in the crypto space has never been determined by your past losses, but rather by whether you are making the right choices now. Choosing is difficult, but at least don't let history constrain your thinking. Time itself has no meaning; the changes brought by time are what matter—it's important to look at the current fundamentals of a project, rather than living in the stories from a few years ago.

ZEC-12,57%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TestnetScholar

· 2025-12-26 13:21

Really, what's the use of constantly digging up old issues? The current data is the real deal.

View OriginalReply0

ForkItAllDay

· 2025-12-26 11:53

Basically, data speaks for itself. Don't always rely on old stories to argue. Really, people still obsessing over history just haven't understood the current growth curve. The ZEC group is even more ridiculous—just because it didn't rise in the past, it should forever be sentenced to death? What's the logic there? Monthly 160 million vs. annual 120 million—doesn't that just mean the project is taking off? In the crypto world, it all depends on current choices; history is just a reference, not a judge, okay? Comparative data needs to be used carefully; don't get the time dimension wrong. The fundamentals have changed, so the story should be rewritten—really. I've seen this kind of argument many times; it's just using past failures to box in current opportunities.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTrapper

· 2025-12-23 13:59

nah actually if you read the tokenomics unlocks... those revenue numbers hit different when you factor in the vesting schedule lmao

Reply0

MEVHunterX

· 2025-12-23 13:41

Oh dear, why get tangled up in history? Earning 160 million a month and still saying there’s no future? --- So what if there were losses in the past? Choosing the right direction now is key. --- Coins like ZEC have been fooled by history; no one even gives them a second glance. --- The data is right here; it’s absurd to keep looking back. --- The improvement cycle is here, and yet you’re still clinging to last year’s story? That’s just too foolish. --- Monthly surpassing annual, and you tell me there’s no future? What’s the logic? --- Just because Privacy Coins haven’t exploded doesn’t mean they’re forever out of the game. These people have such a poor imagination. --- Choosing is hard, but at least don’t get trapped in your thinking. Don’t you have that much awareness? --- The current fundamentals are what matter; why live in the past five years? --- Look at the revenue data, everyone; don’t just focus on the Candlestick charts and cry poverty.

View OriginalReply0