2025-12-23 15:28:31

Many people are following the layout of major projects for 2026. It is understood that RLC is planning its key direction for the new year - making privacy technology the core breakthrough. Why is privacy so important? Simply put, the demand for privacy protection is particularly strong in the areas of institutional-level DeFi applications and RWA (real-world assets on-chain). What is currently lacking in the market is exactly this kind of infrastructure.

From the project perspective, improving the privacy layer can not only meet compliance requirements but also attract institutional investors to enter the market. The RWA sector has maintained its popularity in recent years, but the level of disclosure of counterparty information and transaction details remains a concern for institutions. The addition of privacy technology can ensure transparency while providing participants with the necessary privacy space.

2026 will be a year of testing. We'll see how RLC can truly implement this privacy solution and whether it forms ecological cooperation with mainstream Decentralized Finance protocols; these will all affect the subsequent market performance. I feel this direction is correct; it all depends on execution.

RLC-2.71%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaDreamer

· 12-23 16:12

Privacy is indeed a bottleneck. If RLC can truly deliver a solution for institutional level, there is potential here. --- To be honest, implementation is the real deal. There are many projects just shouting about privacy, let's see how they perform by 2026. --- RWA really needs this, otherwise institutions can't enter the market. I support this idea. --- Execution determines everything. Let's hope it's not just another PPT project. --- Institutional investors are stuck on privacy, and if RLC can seize this opportunity, it shows real imagination. --- The question is how many DeFi protocols are really willing to adopt it? Ecosystem cooperation is not as easy as imagined. --- Balancing privacy and transparency sounds simple but is difficult in practice; we need to see the actual results.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-a180694b

· 12-23 16:07

The combination of privacy + RWA is indeed interesting, but it depends on whether RLC can truly deliver. It's easy to shout slogans. Execution is key, and we'll see the results in 2026. Institutions entering the market need privacy; this logic is sound, but with so many privacy projects out there, why should RLC stand out? To be honest, the competition in the privacy space is too fierce, and whether RLC can navigate this move remains to be seen. Privacy + compliance sounds like trying to please both sides, which feels a bit difficult. The combination of RWA and privacy is innovative, but I'm afraid it might just be another PPT project. Ecosystem cooperation is key; without major protocols taking a stand, it's basically hopeless. I have faith in privacy technology, but does RLC really have the solid technical foundation? This trend is indeed correct, but the question is how much real substance can be produced, not just talk. Privacy + institutional-level applications is a good concept, but competitors are also pushing hard.

View OriginalReply0

DisillusiionOracle

· 12-23 16:01

The area of privacy infrastructure is indeed a blank slate, but whether RLC can shoulder this responsibility depends on real capabilities, not just talk. Institutions entering the market require privacy, and this logic is sound; the concern is that it might end up being a PPT project again. The RWA sector is hot, but implementing privacy solutions is incredibly difficult; does RLC have the confidence? It sounds good, but execution is key. As long as 2026 is not a PPT year, that’s enough. Many people want to combine privacy and DeFi; why should RLC be able to win? I'm curious. Meeting compliance requirements sounds like a forced choice rather than true innovation.

View OriginalReply0

BuyHighSellLow

· 12-23 15:44

The area of privacy infrastructure has indeed been overlooked for too long. If RLC can truly develop an institutional-level solution, that would be reliable. By 2026, we need to see actual implementation, not just talk. Partners are crucial. Institutions do have concerns in the RWA track. If the balance between privacy and transparency can be achieved, it will be interesting. To be honest, execution is key. A good direction doesn’t guarantee success. Privacy technology is indeed a blank slate, but the competition will also be fierce. Ecosystem collaboration is critical; otherwise, even the best technology is useless. Institutions need this, but it also depends on the data. It feels like whoever can truly tackle the issues of privacy and compliance in this era will win. If RLC can really partner with top DeFi protocols, this story will be worth following. A compliance-friendly privacy solution is a good idea, but we worry it might just be another PPT project.

View OriginalReply0