2025-12-23 17:26:39

A fren in the medical beauty industry shared a screenshot with me, and I was dumbfounded after seeing it.

The CodexField project has actually started using offline promotion tactics, and even dares to use the official Twitter of a certain leading exchange for endorsement. They really are getting bolder and bolder 🙄

One has to say that the technique of making this poster is indeed sophisticated - it not only features the Labs logo under a certain major exchange but also uses two different names of institutions to create hype. It seems to be full of authoritative endorsements, but the problem is that people coming from Web2 have no idea that these two institutions are actually the same. Using two seemingly different names to confuse users in order to gain trust is indeed a trick that can fool quite a few people.

This kind of tactic that confuses official identity and fabricates cooperative relationships is not uncommon in the crypto space, but every time I see it, it still leaves me speechless. A reminder to everyone: when verifying project backgrounds and institutional relationships, be sure to check the information multiple times, and don’t be fooled by well-designed posters and seemingly authoritative logos.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PanicSeller

· 2025-12-26 16:48

Another rebranded project, it never ends The CodexField dual-label scam is brilliant; Web2 people are really easy to fool That's how the crypto world is, new tricks every day Verifying backgrounds is really important, or you'll fall into a trap in minutes These days, finding a reliable project is even harder than winning the lottery One project with two aliases, the tactics are getting more and more pretentious I'm already tired of this routine, but the problem is some people still fall for it

View OriginalReply0

LetMeGetRich.

· 2025-12-24 07:07

It's been almost 2 months of participation. Since yesterday, it shows system upgrade and maintenance, and withdrawals are unavailable. I'm speechless. 🤦‍♀️ Are they really planning to run away?

View OriginalReply0

MondayYoloFridayCry

· 2025-12-23 17:58

It's the same old tricks again, the crypto world really has nothing new. CodexField is so blatant in doing this, they're really bold. Two names, one parent; this scam is too deadly for newbies. I've seen too many of these second-rate teams, their tricks are so outdated. No matter how exquisite the posters are, they can't hide the essence of being played for suckers.

View OriginalReply0

PrivateKeyParanoia

· 2025-12-23 17:53

I've seen this trap from CodexField too many times, I'm really tired of it. Why do these people in the crypto world always like to change two names with one alias? Two names to fool newbies, the old trap is just so effective. I just want to know who would still be fooled by such a pathetic poster. Is it really that hard to do your homework, everyone?

View OriginalReply0

WalletManager

· 2025-12-23 17:33

The same wallet address can pass multi-signature verification; I've seen this dual-label trick too many times. You can see through it by checking the contract on-chain, but the problem is that most people don't look at the code at all.

View OriginalReply0