When someone casually swaps VLM for VLA in a conversation, it really does signal a lack of attention to detail. The distinction matters more than you'd think in technical discourse. Getting the terminology right isn't just pedantry—it reflects whether you actually understand what you're talking about or just skimming the surface. If the basics trip you up, why should I trust your deeper insights on the tech?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FlashLoanLord
· 12-23 22:01
Ha, mixing up a VLM and a VLA and still having the audacity to talk endlessly, truly looks down on this kind of behavior.
View OriginalReply0
DegenGambler
· 12-23 22:00
Well, this is a typical fake expert who confuses concepts and refuses to admit it.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 12-23 22:00
Really, the details are not a trivial matter... Many people just don't care.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocity
· 12-23 21:54
Haha really, it's one thing if the terminology confusion happens once or twice, but if it keeps happening, it comes off as unprofessional.
When someone casually swaps VLM for VLA in a conversation, it really does signal a lack of attention to detail. The distinction matters more than you'd think in technical discourse. Getting the terminology right isn't just pedantry—it reflects whether you actually understand what you're talking about or just skimming the surface. If the basics trip you up, why should I trust your deeper insights on the tech?