I want to share an interesting observation at this point in time.

Infrastructure like APRO hasn't suddenly experienced any major events, and prices haven't fluctuated dramatically, but in reality, it is approaching a critical point. To put it more bluntly, everything seems calm on the surface, but various underlying conditions of the system are slowly aligning.

I have been involved in many infrastructure projects, and real breakthroughs are never accomplished with just an official announcement. Changes usually occur when multiple factors act simultaneously, and only then does the market suddenly react—oh, it turns out this thing has become indispensable.

Taking APRO as an example, I can now see three forces gradually converging.

**First, let's look at the shift in usage logic**. In the early years, when oracles were connected to many application chains, the mindset was basically experimental. They were using alternatives, testing interfaces, and non-critical modules. However, once oracles began to be used in critical positions such as clearing, settlement, and risk control triggers—where "no mistakes can be tolerated"—the rules of the game changed completely. At this point, it was no longer a simple integration relationship, but a real dependency.

Looking at APRO's recent overall pace, it is obviously moving towards the direction of "core calls" rather than staying focused on peripheral functions. This process is very slow, but once it is truly completed, there is basically no turning back.

**Look at the developer's mindset again**. Many people only pay attention to the technical indicators of the infrastructure, but what's more terrifying is the usage habits. Once a certain group of developers forms a mindset of "defaulting to a certain component" in a new project, rather than comparing and selecting anew each time, the market advantage of that component will continue to expand. Once this mentality becomes entrenched, it will create a strong path dependency effect.

The moat of infrastructure ultimately lies in this intangible dependence—developers do not consciously choose it as a necessity, but rather habitually select it, only to find that it cannot be replaced.