#BTC对标贵金属的竞争格局 Many people compare Bitcoin to gold, but frankly, the relationship between the two is not that simple. In the long run, they are indeed not closely linked, but in the short term, they are often driven by the same narrative. In the early stages of a loose monetary policy, both tend to rise — at this point, everyone is looking for ways to hedge and appreciate value. But when the real test comes, such as interest rate hikes or strict regulations, gold often remains as stable as a rock, while $BTC begins to experience a roller coaster ride. Why is that? The core difference lies here: gold is a traditional safe-haven asset, favored by central banks, backed by thousands of years of trust; while Bitcoin, although it claims to be a safe haven, is fundamentally a risk asset, with a strong technological attribute that cannot tolerate policy fluctuations. To put it bluntly, the two are not in a substitutive relationship; rather, they are complementary — in different market environments, they can play their respective roles, and when combined, they can balance fluctuations. This is why professional investors often grasp both sides.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CrashHotline
· 2025-12-27 00:49
Gold has been stable for thousands of years, but BTC is just a young kid in his twenties. Can it compare?
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivor
· 2025-12-25 13:45
I've been through it all. Regarding gold and BTC, I saw through it during the 2018 mining crisis — they seem complementary on the surface, but in reality, one is like a grandma to the central bank, and the other is a child who is arbitrarily thrown around by policies.
View OriginalReply0
liquiditea_sipper
· 2025-12-24 02:03
Gold has been trusted and endorsed for thousands of years, while BTC is just a little tech child; no wonder it collapses at the slightest disturbance.
View OriginalReply0
ForkPrince
· 2025-12-24 01:58
Gold is indeed an "antique", but that's its advantage; once the policy comes in, it stabilizes like a rock, while BTC is more likely to be scared and dart around.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSnapHunter
· 2025-12-24 01:51
Gold can lie flat for thousands of years, while Bitcoin can collapse with just one policy; the difference is not small at all.
#BTC对标贵金属的竞争格局 Many people compare Bitcoin to gold, but frankly, the relationship between the two is not that simple. In the long run, they are indeed not closely linked, but in the short term, they are often driven by the same narrative. In the early stages of a loose monetary policy, both tend to rise — at this point, everyone is looking for ways to hedge and appreciate value. But when the real test comes, such as interest rate hikes or strict regulations, gold often remains as stable as a rock, while $BTC begins to experience a roller coaster ride. Why is that? The core difference lies here: gold is a traditional safe-haven asset, favored by central banks, backed by thousands of years of trust; while Bitcoin, although it claims to be a safe haven, is fundamentally a risk asset, with a strong technological attribute that cannot tolerate policy fluctuations. To put it bluntly, the two are not in a substitutive relationship; rather, they are complementary — in different market environments, they can play their respective roles, and when combined, they can balance fluctuations. This is why professional investors often grasp both sides.