$FKH truly achieves community leadership and fair distribution—there are no key figures calling the shots, nor are there Large Investors who easily engage in dumping controlling the situation. This model is actually quite rare in stablecoin pairs.
On the other hand, WorldLibertyFi's operations on Solana seem somewhat immature. The entire process is filled with immature decisions, and you can sense a lack of experience from the project promotion pace to the ecological layout. In some areas, it is obvious that there have been detours, which is why many people are cautious about its prospects.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenTherapist
· 12-26 22:52
FKH this model is really genuine; big investors' words count, and this is true decentralization.
The operation of WorldLibertyFi... is indeed clumsy, taking many detours.
Scarcity is worth holding, and no other project has played like this.
Finally, someone can control the big investors' dumping, feeling enlightened.
View OriginalReply0
InfraVibes
· 12-25 19:57
FKH this wave is really a reverse operation, not having the feel of a mafia boss instead makes it seem more unusual
---
WLF's approach on the Solana chain... how to say it, it feels like they haven't grasped the game rules
---
Fair distribution sounds great, but can it really be held long-term? Question mark
---
There are many projects in the Solana ecosystem that have taken detours, WLF is not the most competitive either
---
The $FKH decentralization approach, I've heard quite a bit about it, but I don't know if they'll change face again later
---
WorldLibertyFi's steps are indeed a bit fragmented, which is a big taboo in Web3
---
Having no core figure in power sounds ideal, but in practice, it can easily lead to failure
---
WLF's layout looks like a beginner playing King of Glory, the rhythm is completely messed up
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLord
· 12-25 07:00
FKH really hit me this time; true decentralization is not just a slogan. It's rare to see such actions.
That set from WorldLibertyFi... uh, it’s a bit like a rookie opening, taking too big a step and messing up.
Controlling the market with big players is basically hooliganism. FKH doesn’t use this trick, which makes it stand out.
This project on Solana seems to have taken quite a few detours, which is why I’m watching cautiously.
Fair distribution sounds easy, but FKH is actually doing it. Not many stablecoin pairs are like that.
However, over at WorldLibertyFi, they are still too young and naive.
FKH’s model is the right way; I’m happy that they’re not afraid of big players dumping the market.
View OriginalReply0
LazyDevMiner
· 12-24 04:50
The community has the final say, which sounds good, but I still want to see financial data... Can this really hold up just because there are no Large Investors?
---
I really don't understand the way WLF operates; it feels like they are just making random mistakes.
---
The $FKH model is indeed rare, but we need to see if it can really be sustained.
---
Is it easier to disperse without key figures? I'm worried about this.
---
The new projects on Solana are basically all the same; they've learned from falling once or twice.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWang
· 12-24 04:50
Community-led sounds good, but the question is can it really persist? History tells me that most can't withstand the first wave of Favourable Information.
WorldLibertyFi is indeed disappointing, and there are too many projects like that in the Solana ecosystem; falling is the norm.
I have high hopes for FKH's design concept, but I'm afraid it will get distorted when the capital comes in later.
Stablecoin pairs without Large Investors dumping? That needs to be verified with real money; don't just talk about concepts.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-3824aa38
· 12-24 04:39
Fair distribution sounds nice, but I'm afraid it's just talk without action.
Wait, is WLF really that bad? I see their fundraising is going quite smoothly.
Scarcity is one thing, but how long can it last is the key.
That's how it is with projects; young teams always need to stumble to learn.
Having community leadership is good, but I worry in the end it's still a few celebrities calling the shots.
WorldLibertyFi does seem a bit like a trial-and-error product, but maybe that's just the cost of growth.
Nowadays, anyone can boast about "Decentralization," let's see how long FKH's approach can last.
Scarcity doesn't mean it's user-friendly, I'm only looking at the results.
View OriginalReply0
Fren_Not_Food
· 12-24 04:25
The recent wave of FKH is truly a Reverse operation, no big shots and no dumping monsters, the community plays by itself, quite interesting.
The WLF crowd is indeed disappointing, messing around on Solana, everywhere is a feeling of inexperience.
Wait a minute, how does FKH guarantee that no one is secretly playing people for suckers?
The path of WorldLibertyFi is a textbook-level compilation of pitfalls.
In the stablecoin pairings, FKH's model is indeed rare, but can it hold up? Question mark.
WLF is purely a Newbie village storyline, wanting to try everything.
Looking at the benchmarks, FKH's Decentralization plan sounds good, but what about in practice?
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHigh
· 12-24 04:24
The way FKH is going is really impressive, it feels great without the vibe of a Large Investor manipulating it.
WorldLibertyFi over there is indeed lacking, it feels like they are still in the exploration stage.
In terms of stablecoin pairing, FKH's approach is quite interesting.
What WLF is doing on Sol looks like a Newbie trying to find their way.
By the way, are there really so few truly decentralized projects? Is FKH one of them?
Large Investors dumping is the most annoying, finally seeing a bit of restraint.
WLF really hasn't grasped the rhythm of this, they are too anxious.
FKH's model in the stablecoin space is indeed rare.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoaster
· 12-24 04:22
FKH's ability to resist dumping this time is indeed strong, and it feels quite comfortable without the celebrity choking the neck.
The operation of WorldLibertyFi is really disappointing, and you can find problems just by casually looking around in the Solana ecosystem.
There is still a huge difference between true decentralization and false decentralization.
In this round, some projects have died and some have been injured, just because someone wants to be the father.
$FKH truly achieves community leadership and fair distribution—there are no key figures calling the shots, nor are there Large Investors who easily engage in dumping controlling the situation. This model is actually quite rare in stablecoin pairs.
On the other hand, WorldLibertyFi's operations on Solana seem somewhat immature. The entire process is filled with immature decisions, and you can sense a lack of experience from the project promotion pace to the ecological layout. In some areas, it is obvious that there have been detours, which is why many people are cautious about its prospects.