Having been in the crypto market for many years and seen too many projects rise and fall, I feel differently when I reassess my position in Falcon.
2024 will be the year of the booming modular public chains, and by 2025, the trend will have shifted to the combination of "AI + execution layer." Falcon happens to be at the center of this crossroads.
Many people ask why they are optimistic about Falcon, especially in an era where L2 and L3 are already everywhere. Simply put, it addresses the most fundamental pain point of blockchain - intention delay.
Imagine that traditional public chains are like old drivers who must manually shift gears, waiting for confirmation with each operation. Falcon, however, breaks this logic with its "asynchronous state execution mechanism," essentially redesigning the physical efficiency of the blockchain.
By 2025, merely competing on TPS will be outdated. The real dimension of competition has shifted to "effective throughput"—that is, how many meaningful transactions can actually be processed in a given unit of time. Falcon elevates this number by an order of magnitude by introducing AI agents to handle smart routing and state prediction.
This is not a fictional narrative, but an infrastructure-level upgrade. To me, Falcon is more like a digital asset left for the next generation of the internet—not just an investment, but a part of the ecosystem.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SelfStaking
· 8h ago
Asynchronous execution does have some substance, but we need to see how it performs once it is actually launched.
View OriginalReply0
HodlTheDoor
· 8h ago
It's another "infrastructure upgrade" story, I've heard too many of them.
But this time it does feel a bit different... If the asynchronous execution framework can really be implemented, it would be quite satisfying.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 8h ago
Asynchronous execution of this trap theory does sound interesting, but it still feels like we have to wait for real data to speak.
View OriginalReply0
ProxyCollector
· 8h ago
The asynchronous execution trap indeed captures the pain points, but it remains to be seen whether it can truly be implemented in practice.
View OriginalReply0
WalletAnxietyPatient
· 8h ago
Asynchronous state execution? Sounds like a bull, but can this trap really be implemented?
Having been in the crypto market for many years and seen too many projects rise and fall, I feel differently when I reassess my position in Falcon.
2024 will be the year of the booming modular public chains, and by 2025, the trend will have shifted to the combination of "AI + execution layer." Falcon happens to be at the center of this crossroads.
Many people ask why they are optimistic about Falcon, especially in an era where L2 and L3 are already everywhere. Simply put, it addresses the most fundamental pain point of blockchain - intention delay.
Imagine that traditional public chains are like old drivers who must manually shift gears, waiting for confirmation with each operation. Falcon, however, breaks this logic with its "asynchronous state execution mechanism," essentially redesigning the physical efficiency of the blockchain.
By 2025, merely competing on TPS will be outdated. The real dimension of competition has shifted to "effective throughput"—that is, how many meaningful transactions can actually be processed in a given unit of time. Falcon elevates this number by an order of magnitude by introducing AI agents to handle smart routing and state prediction.
This is not a fictional narrative, but an infrastructure-level upgrade. To me, Falcon is more like a digital asset left for the next generation of the internet—not just an investment, but a part of the ecosystem.