The day before yesterday, the US GDP data was released, showing a growth rate of 4.3%, while inflation rebounded to 2.8%. This set of data sparked lively discussions in social circles. Interestingly, these numbers seem to provide some kind of answer to the policy debates that have lasted throughout the past year.



Do you remember that intense policy debate? One side insisted on more aggressive measures to lower financing costs, even calling for interest rates to be pushed down to 1%; the other side maintained a stance of stability. But the actual data gave us the answer: if interest rates had been significantly lowered back then, given the current 2.8% inflation rebound rate, the purchasing power of ordinary people's assets would have long been eroded.

This makes me think of a somewhat harsh reality: our wealth and future are often controlled by the power struggles of a few decision-makers. Every interest rate adjustment, every policy shift, could rewrite the asset allocation of ordinary people. This sense of uncontrollability indeed makes people feel powerless.

It is this kind of reflection that has led me to reevaluate my own asset structure. If the mainstream financial system is filled with these uncertainties, then finding a fundamentally more stable and transparent form of assets becomes necessary. Stablecoins in the crypto space have given me a new idea: they do not rely on any single decision-making authority, are backed by over-collateralized assets, and aim to maintain value stability.

This is not a rejection of traditional finance, but a supplement— in an era of macro policy fluctuations, having a stable asset allocation that is relatively independent of such changes might be a more rational way to manage risk. Not being hostage to power struggles, allowing assets to truly preserve value according to one's own will—this kind of choice, I now understand more deeply.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HodlVeteranvip
· 2025-12-27 08:51
Ha, coming with this again? I don't believe the 1% interest rate. By then, I should have already gone all-in on USDC... What am I regretting now?
View OriginalReply0
MemeTokenGeniusvip
· 2025-12-25 22:51
Ha, pushing interest rates down to 1% was already a slap in the face, and now with 2.8% inflation coming --- Power struggles are well explained, but are stablecoins really stable... it still depends on collateral --- US GDP at 4.3%, sounds great, but everyone’s money is depreciating --- Every time policies change, it alters the fate, and this feeling is truly suffocating --- Instead of waiting for decision-makers to save me, it's better to allocate some independent assets; I can accept this logic --- Inflation is rising, and the transparency of traditional finance is just so-so --- Stablecoins sound good, but they are still just a choice within the game rules --- Speaking of which, can Web3 truly solve the issue of power struggles hijacking wealth?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-74b10196vip
· 2025-12-24 10:51
Honestly, the GDP looks good, but the inflation number is a bit scary, it feels like a slap in the face to the radicals. If interest rates really drop to 1%, our wallets are probably going to shrink even more. The power struggle really hits a nerve; ordinary people are the ones being played. I'm a bit intrigued by the idea of stablecoins, at least we don't have to watch the decision-makers' faces every day. But on the other hand, the risks in crypto aren't small either. Can we really trust that over-collateralization? It still feels safer to diversify across multiple baskets of eggs.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentSagevip
· 2025-12-24 10:51
Come on, honestly, it's just about moving money into stablecoins, don't dress it up so fancy. --- Inflation of 2.8% is truly outrageous, purchasing power is evaporating day by day, no wonder people's minds are restless. --- The part about power struggles hits home; we are just the passive ones getting beaten. --- Instead of trusting stablecoins, it's better to think more about how to lie flat. --- This logic is a bit convoluted, in the end, it's still about wanting to push stablecoins, right? The tactics are pretty similar. --- If these US data were released domestically, there would have been a lot of discussion already. Over here, it's surprisingly calm.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMigrantvip
· 2025-12-24 10:44
Honestly, the Fed's recent moves really have everyone spinning in circles. GDP at 4.3% looks impressive, but then inflation jumps back to 2.8%, isn't this just setting a trap for retail investors to fill? The tearing during that rate war year was truly intense. Now it seems friends who bet on aggressive rate cuts are probably regretting it to the core. Purchasing power can disappear just like that; there's no way to defend against it. I'm also considering the path of stablecoins, but honestly, it still depends on who provides the backing. Over-collateralization sounds good, but what if it collapses one day? Power struggles just change masks and continue on-chain? But indeed, I need something that isn't controlled by these people, I get that feeling.
View OriginalReply0
MetaLord420vip
· 2025-12-24 10:26
Ha, another old trick of power struggles, we retail investors are always pawns. Inflation at 2.8%? That data cracked me up. Everyone can feel their wallets shrinking, right? Instead of waiting for them to decide our future, why not find our own way out? I'm also considering stablecoins. With macro policies so unpredictable, traditional finance is no longer reliable. Diversifying risk is necessary. Interest rate 1%? Haha, don't even think about it. Ordinary people are just being harvested like this, right? But on the other hand, are crypto stablecoins really stable? We need to stay alert. High GDP and high inflation, why haven't ordinary wages moved? This logic is really absurd. The feeling of independent asset allocation is indeed appealing, no need to be at the mercy of central banks. Basically, it's about distrust in a single authority. I agree with that, but it's not a foolproof solution either. In a world of power struggles, we are indeed too powerless, but can stablecoins really be trusted?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)