Scroll DAO has not closed; after governance structure optimization, the community funding program reaches a new high

GasFeeLady · 2025-12-24T14:40:09+00:00

Recent misconceptions about Scroll suggest that the DAO is disbanding, but in reality, it is a restructuring of the governance framework. Scroll DAO is continuing its governance work, having just approved the Galileo upgrade proposal. Community participation has increased, with a total of 488 funding applications, demonstrating ecosystem expansion and mature governance.

GasFeeLady

2025-12-24 14:40:09

Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】Recently, many people have misunderstood that the DAO is about to disband after seeing related announcements from Scroll. In fact, it was a misunderstanding. The real situation is this—Scroll is restructuring its governance framework. This does not mean the DAO is closing; on the contrary, DAO governance work is still ongoing, just optimized and adjusted based on past experience.

Specifically, Scroll DAO recently approved the Galileo upgrade proposal, indicating that the on-chain governance system is still functioning normally. Even more impressive are the results of the community funding program: 488 applications were received from over 40 countries worldwide, with a total funding amount of approximately $82,500. There is also a noteworthy figure behind this—2,162 people participated in related community activities.

These data reflect the expansion of the Scroll ecosystem and increasing community engagement. DAO governance has not stopped; it is simply moving toward a more mature stage.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NotGonnaMakeIt

· 2025-12-26 12:00

Damn, I was really scared before, thinking Scroll DAO was going to fail. Turns out it's just optimizing governance. 488 applications, $82,500 in funding. The data is indeed pretty good, indicating that the community still has enthusiasm. 2162 people participated. That's the real focus, right? The ecosystem is indeed growing.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-75ee51e7

· 2025-12-25 02:15

Ah, once again a false alarm. No wonder the group was buzzing yesterday. I said it’s impossible for a DAO to just disband casually. Looking at the $82,500 funding amount, the participation is also increasing, which shows the ecosystem is still active.

View OriginalReply0

GasBandit

· 2025-12-24 15:10

Haha, it's just another false alarm. Every time, someone panics thinking the DAO is gone. What stands out is the data from the 2162 participants; its authenticity speaks louder than any official figures. The $82,500 funding is decent, but considering over 40 countries worldwide applied for this amount, it feels a bit tight on average. I've heard the phrase "optimization of governance structure" too many times; the key is to see what Galileo can actually deliver after the upgrade. That's what Scroll should focus on—quietly building rather than constantly releasing flashy announcements.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwichVictim

· 2025-12-24 15:01

Haha, oops, luckily it's not disbanding, that scared me to death. Wait, only $82,500 in funding? Wow, 2,162 people participated, this data is pretty solid. Scroll is working seriously, unlike some L2s that just shout slogans every day. DAO optimization is a good thing, just don't mess around. This ecosystem is indeed growing up, with 488 applications from over 40 countries worldwide, impressive. However, the funding amount should be multiplied several times to match this level of enthusiasm. Governance maturity? Feels like just the beginning.

View OriginalReply0

MemeTokenGenius

· 2025-12-24 14:54

Haha, did someone really get scared and think the DAO was gone before? LOL, that's just a gap in information, brother. Funding of $82,500 is pretty good, but I just want to know how many of the 2,162 people are actually building the ecosystem.

View OriginalReply0