A blockchain application recently completed its $2M campaign rewards distribution, with individual payouts ranging between $15 and $3,000 for qualified participants. The outcome reveals an interesting segmentation: some users successfully claimed their rewards without issues, while others encountered various challenges or discrepancies in the distribution process, and a third group appears to have faced eligibility concerns or processing delays. This multi-tiered outcome has sparked community conversations around reward allocation transparency and the mechanisms behind participant qualification. The variance in payout amounts and the apparent distribution inconsistencies suggest different participation levels or engagement metrics were factored into the calculation, though users are actively discussing whether the criteria were clearly communicated.