The most dramatic reversal of the year happened at the highest levels of U.S. political and economic power.
Trump has frequently criticized Powell. From calling him a "loser" to "Mr. Too Late," he has criticized him relentlessly, with the sole goal of pushing interest rates down to 1% to "stimulate the economy." Everyone was waiting to see if the central bank would bow.
Then last night, when the U.S. Q3 GDP data was released, the room fell silent. An annualized growth of 4.3% directly slapped down all pessimistic expectations. Inflation also suddenly jumped from 2.1% to 2.8%. The economy didn't collapse; instead, it’s becoming a bit hot.
Look, if we really followed Trump’s aggressive rate-cutting approach, inflation would have already exploded, and the nightmare of stagflation would be unavoidable. Powell didn’t say much this time; he responded with the hardest data-based stance.
But behind this power struggle, deeper issues are surfacing.
When the top decision-makers of a country have such divergent understandings of the economic direction, and political battles are so fierce, how does the market price assets? When policy paths become unclear, financial volatility naturally increases. Whether it’s stablecoins like USDD or various asset allocations, in this environment, everyone needs to ask themselves: who can they trust?
We are experiencing a shift from a world of "rules to follow" to one "deeply influenced by power narratives." The traditional methods of judging based on central bank policy clarity and government fiscal stability are failing. Market participants must either adapt to this uncertainty or repeatedly stumble in the volatility.
This is not just an economic issue; it’s a matter of survival for participants.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RealYieldWizard
· 20h ago
Powell is really impressive; as soon as the data came out, it shut Trump's mouth, showing an incredible level of firmness.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c799715c
· 20h ago
Powell's data-driven counterattack is brilliant; Trump's bluster was directly crushed by GDP.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearcher
· 20h ago
It is worth noting that the 4.3% GDP growth rate essentially confirms the market pricing failure under policy uncertainty—this is a typical manifestation of information asymmetry at the macro level.
View OriginalReply0
SquidTeacher
· 20h ago
Powell's move with data hits hard, giving Trump a loud slap in the face, feels great
View OriginalReply0
BankruptcyArtist
· 20h ago
Powell's move this time is brilliant, directly countering with a 4.3% GDP, more assertive than any statement.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardian
· 20h ago
Powell's move to confront with data is satisfying, but retail investors still need to think about where to put their money.
The most dramatic reversal of the year happened at the highest levels of U.S. political and economic power.
Trump has frequently criticized Powell. From calling him a "loser" to "Mr. Too Late," he has criticized him relentlessly, with the sole goal of pushing interest rates down to 1% to "stimulate the economy." Everyone was waiting to see if the central bank would bow.
Then last night, when the U.S. Q3 GDP data was released, the room fell silent. An annualized growth of 4.3% directly slapped down all pessimistic expectations. Inflation also suddenly jumped from 2.1% to 2.8%. The economy didn't collapse; instead, it’s becoming a bit hot.
Look, if we really followed Trump’s aggressive rate-cutting approach, inflation would have already exploded, and the nightmare of stagflation would be unavoidable. Powell didn’t say much this time; he responded with the hardest data-based stance.
But behind this power struggle, deeper issues are surfacing.
When the top decision-makers of a country have such divergent understandings of the economic direction, and political battles are so fierce, how does the market price assets? When policy paths become unclear, financial volatility naturally increases. Whether it’s stablecoins like USDD or various asset allocations, in this environment, everyone needs to ask themselves: who can they trust?
We are experiencing a shift from a world of "rules to follow" to one "deeply influenced by power narratives." The traditional methods of judging based on central bank policy clarity and government fiscal stability are failing. Market participants must either adapt to this uncertainty or repeatedly stumble in the volatility.
This is not just an economic issue; it’s a matter of survival for participants.