Interesting chain of events with Logan Paul and his NFT card dealings. He fractured the card and distributed ownership shares to users on a certain platform, later claiming the platform exit-scammed the fractional holders. What didn't get highlighted? He actually owns that platform himself. Plot twist—he's currently relisting the card for sale again. The whole sequence raises questions about incentive alignment and transparency when a single party controls both sides of the transaction. Whether intentional or not, it's a textbook case of conflicting interests in the crypto asset space.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GhostChainLoyalist
· 13h ago
Damn, this move is genius—running your own platform to harvest profits and still walk away unscathed.
View OriginalReply0
digital_archaeologist
· 13h ago
Logan's move is brilliant. He set up a platform to harvest investors' funds himself and still dares to say he was exit scammed? He really thinks we're fools.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureDenied
· 13h ago
Running your own platform and taking the cut yourself—this strategy is brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeWhisperer
· 13h ago
NGL Logan Paul is really the most outrageous trader in crypto, cutting his own platform himself. This move is absolutely brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
shadowy_supercoder
· 13h ago
Logan's own platform said it ran away, and now he's trying to sell cards? This guy really knows how to play.
Interesting chain of events with Logan Paul and his NFT card dealings. He fractured the card and distributed ownership shares to users on a certain platform, later claiming the platform exit-scammed the fractional holders. What didn't get highlighted? He actually owns that platform himself. Plot twist—he's currently relisting the card for sale again. The whole sequence raises questions about incentive alignment and transparency when a single party controls both sides of the transaction. Whether intentional or not, it's a textbook case of conflicting interests in the crypto asset space.