The Paradox of Massive Selling and Selective Buying
The investment world often sends mixed signals. Over the first nine months of 2025, Berkshire Hathaway executed a notable strategy: unloading more than $24 billion in equities while simultaneously deploying approximately $14 billion into fresh positions. On the surface, this appears contradictory. Dig deeper, and you’ll find a coherent philosophy about navigating an expensive market.
This pattern isn’t new. For three consecutive years—twelve quarters in a row—Buffett’s holding company has maintained a net selling posture. The result? Cash reserves have climbed to an extraordinary $354 billion by Q3 2025, a level the legendary investor had never accumulated before. The message is unmistakable: broad market valuations have become stretched relative to underlying business fundamentals.
Why the Skepticism on U.S. Equities?
The numbers tell the story. The so-called Buffett Indicator—which compares total U.S. stock market capitalization to gross domestic product—now sits around 225%. By Buffett’s own assessment, investors operating at this level are “playing with fire.” Add to this the price-to-earnings multiples on the S&P 500, which have drifted toward levels unseen since the dot-com bubble, and the hesitation becomes rational rather than fearful.
Yet Buffett hasn’t simply parked everything in Treasury bills. Instead, he’s signaled that opportunities still exist—they simply require looking beyond the usual suspects. This brings us to three significant acquisitions totaling $14 billion.
The Three Purchases That Define Current Strategy
The Technology Play: Alphabet
Warren’s recent purchase of 17.8 million shares of Alphabet surprised many observers. For decades, the Oracle of Omaha maintained skepticism toward technology stocks. The acquisition of approximately $4 billion in shares marked a rare pivot. What changed? The valuation math worked. Last quarter, Alphabet traded below 20 times forward earnings—substantially cheaper than both the broader AI stock cohort and the S&P 500 average itself. Despite aggressive capital deployment toward AI infrastructure, the company continues generating tens of billions in free cash flow quarterly. Sometimes, even legendary investors recognize when a quality asset becomes attractive.
The Industrial Opportunity: OxyChem from Occidental Petroleum
The $9.7 billion acquisition of OxyChem demonstrates how Buffett expands his universe beyond public markets. Berkshire identified the chemicals sector as broadly undervalued, then secured superior economics by acquiring an entire operational subsidiary rather than competing in the open market. The arrangement also allowed Berkshire to maintain its preferred stake in Occidental Petroleum, which carries an 8% dividend yield—roughly double what Treasury instruments currently offer. With Berkshire holding 28% of Occidental’s common equity, this deal strengthens the parent company’s long-term trajectory.
The International Shift: Japanese Trading Houses
A third cluster of deals involved increased positions in Mitsubishi and Mitsui, Japanese trading conglomerates. Buffett rarely ventures internationally; when he does, it typically reflects the influence of late partner Charlie Munger. These trading houses, initially accumulated in 2020, have been topped up in 2025 as the Japanese equity market offers more compelling risk-reward than U.S. large-caps. Even with price-to-book ratios climbing to roughly 1.5x, these positions remain comparatively attractive on a global basis.
What This Means for Ordinary Investors
Replicating Buffett’s playbook carries inherent limitations. He possesses access to private deals like OxyChem that retail investors will never encounter. Conversely, Berkshire Hathaway’s $1 trillion-plus scale sometimes prevents participation in smaller, high-return opportunities that smaller portfolios can easily exploit.
The broader lesson, however, transcends these constraints. The message is straightforward: expensive markets remain navigable, but success requires venturing beyond comfort zones. This might mean researching smaller-capitalization domestic names, exploring European equities, or—as Buffett demonstrated—allocating to non-U.S. markets. Small-cap U.S. stocks and European and Japanese equities currently offer more compelling valuations than mega-cap American growth names.
These alternatives demand more legwork. They receive less media attention and minimal analyst coverage, requiring independent research and conviction. Yet Buffett’s latest deployment of capital suggests that patient, disciplined investors willing to broaden their scope can still uncover exceptional opportunities, even when headline valuations appear stretched across traditional benchmarks.
The cash Warren has accumulated isn’t a vote of no-confidence in capitalism—it’s a reminder that investment excellence demands selectivity, patience, and the willingness to think differently when consensus gets crowded.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
When the Market Looks Expensive: How Warren Buffett's $354 Billion Cash Hoard and Strategic Purchases Reveal Today's Investment Puzzle
The Paradox of Massive Selling and Selective Buying
The investment world often sends mixed signals. Over the first nine months of 2025, Berkshire Hathaway executed a notable strategy: unloading more than $24 billion in equities while simultaneously deploying approximately $14 billion into fresh positions. On the surface, this appears contradictory. Dig deeper, and you’ll find a coherent philosophy about navigating an expensive market.
This pattern isn’t new. For three consecutive years—twelve quarters in a row—Buffett’s holding company has maintained a net selling posture. The result? Cash reserves have climbed to an extraordinary $354 billion by Q3 2025, a level the legendary investor had never accumulated before. The message is unmistakable: broad market valuations have become stretched relative to underlying business fundamentals.
Why the Skepticism on U.S. Equities?
The numbers tell the story. The so-called Buffett Indicator—which compares total U.S. stock market capitalization to gross domestic product—now sits around 225%. By Buffett’s own assessment, investors operating at this level are “playing with fire.” Add to this the price-to-earnings multiples on the S&P 500, which have drifted toward levels unseen since the dot-com bubble, and the hesitation becomes rational rather than fearful.
Yet Buffett hasn’t simply parked everything in Treasury bills. Instead, he’s signaled that opportunities still exist—they simply require looking beyond the usual suspects. This brings us to three significant acquisitions totaling $14 billion.
The Three Purchases That Define Current Strategy
The Technology Play: Alphabet
Warren’s recent purchase of 17.8 million shares of Alphabet surprised many observers. For decades, the Oracle of Omaha maintained skepticism toward technology stocks. The acquisition of approximately $4 billion in shares marked a rare pivot. What changed? The valuation math worked. Last quarter, Alphabet traded below 20 times forward earnings—substantially cheaper than both the broader AI stock cohort and the S&P 500 average itself. Despite aggressive capital deployment toward AI infrastructure, the company continues generating tens of billions in free cash flow quarterly. Sometimes, even legendary investors recognize when a quality asset becomes attractive.
The Industrial Opportunity: OxyChem from Occidental Petroleum
The $9.7 billion acquisition of OxyChem demonstrates how Buffett expands his universe beyond public markets. Berkshire identified the chemicals sector as broadly undervalued, then secured superior economics by acquiring an entire operational subsidiary rather than competing in the open market. The arrangement also allowed Berkshire to maintain its preferred stake in Occidental Petroleum, which carries an 8% dividend yield—roughly double what Treasury instruments currently offer. With Berkshire holding 28% of Occidental’s common equity, this deal strengthens the parent company’s long-term trajectory.
The International Shift: Japanese Trading Houses
A third cluster of deals involved increased positions in Mitsubishi and Mitsui, Japanese trading conglomerates. Buffett rarely ventures internationally; when he does, it typically reflects the influence of late partner Charlie Munger. These trading houses, initially accumulated in 2020, have been topped up in 2025 as the Japanese equity market offers more compelling risk-reward than U.S. large-caps. Even with price-to-book ratios climbing to roughly 1.5x, these positions remain comparatively attractive on a global basis.
What This Means for Ordinary Investors
Replicating Buffett’s playbook carries inherent limitations. He possesses access to private deals like OxyChem that retail investors will never encounter. Conversely, Berkshire Hathaway’s $1 trillion-plus scale sometimes prevents participation in smaller, high-return opportunities that smaller portfolios can easily exploit.
The broader lesson, however, transcends these constraints. The message is straightforward: expensive markets remain navigable, but success requires venturing beyond comfort zones. This might mean researching smaller-capitalization domestic names, exploring European equities, or—as Buffett demonstrated—allocating to non-U.S. markets. Small-cap U.S. stocks and European and Japanese equities currently offer more compelling valuations than mega-cap American growth names.
These alternatives demand more legwork. They receive less media attention and minimal analyst coverage, requiring independent research and conviction. Yet Buffett’s latest deployment of capital suggests that patient, disciplined investors willing to broaden their scope can still uncover exceptional opportunities, even when headline valuations appear stretched across traditional benchmarks.
The cash Warren has accumulated isn’t a vote of no-confidence in capitalism—it’s a reminder that investment excellence demands selectivity, patience, and the willingness to think differently when consensus gets crowded.