2025-12-26 10:10:39

#美联储回购协议计划 Hyperliquid community voting has been finalized. Yesterday's governance vote passed with an 85% approval rate, deciding to permanently burn approximately 11.07% of the $HYPE circulating supply. The official has confirmed this result.

Token burning is not a new practice in the crypto ecosystem, but burning over 10% of the circulating supply at once? This can indeed change market expectations. Generally speaking, a reduction in circulating supply implies increased scarcity, and with such high community participation and consensus, the long-term sentiment for $HYPE has been truly ignited. From the supply side, this kind of reduction often makes holders feel optimistic—not necessarily that the price will rise, but that this governance approach shows the project and community are seriously considering the token's long-term value.

HYPE-0,73%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

UncleWhale

· 5h ago

Destroying 11% in one go? That's quite a bold move, but we'll have to see if there's follow-up action to match it.

View OriginalReply0

UncleLiquidation

· 5h ago

Burning 11% at once? This is no joke, it feels a bit harsh. Destroying tokens has been overused, but such a large-scale move is indeed rare... Now we're just waiting to see how it will develop. This round of HYPE operations is truly impressive, and the high community consensus is also rare. What can burning tokens really change? Honestly, it still depends on how the subsequent development goes. Users should also be cautious about the dividend distribution that cuts into the leek users.

View OriginalReply0

ZenChainWalker

· 12-26 20:17

Destroying so much? It directly maximizes expectations. With such strong community consensus, what is there to fear?

View OriginalReply0

DeFi_Dad_Jokes

· 12-26 10:40

Damn, a one-time burn of 11%. That's a bold move. But an 85% approval rate shows the community has truly reached a consensus, and that's the key.

View OriginalReply0

DataChief

· 12-26 10:33

Wow, 11% burned in one go. The community consensus is really strong; an 85% approval rate directly explains the issue.

View OriginalReply0

ETH_Maxi_Taxi

· 12-26 10:31

Destroying over 10% of the circulating supply, this move is indeed aggressive, and such high community consensus is quite rare. But will it really increase the price? Let's wait and see. If this wave is just hype, the tactics are still the old tricks. 11%? If it can truly sustain the price, that would be impressive. I believe in Hyperliquid's governance approach, which is much better than some projects. Wait, could this be just a prelude to a K-line scam... An 85% approval rate is indeed quite high; the community's recognition is well done. Destroying ≠ price increase, don't get caught being "cut the leeks," everyone. Real and serious reduction operations, at least the attitude is genuine. With less circulating supply, could liquidity become a problem?

View OriginalReply0

BrokenRugs

· 12-26 10:26

11% direct burn, this move is really ruthless, but it depends on how things develop afterward...

View OriginalReply0

SellTheBounce

· 12-26 10:26

I've heard the argument about destroying circulating supply too many times. Every time, they say it increases scarcity. But what happens? When there's a rebound, you should sell. Don't be fooled by these governance stories.

View OriginalReply0