The emergence of the KGST stablecoin in the blockchain space is indeed somewhat special — it is the first stablecoin project to receive national support.
In the current stablecoin market, dominated by USD-pegged products like USDT and USDC, KGST, as a stablecoin backed by national-level support, opens another window. This official backing usually signifies stronger credit endorsement and compliance advantages. Compared to purely commercial stablecoin projects, the transparency of risk management may adhere to higher standards.
From a technical and application perspective, government-supported stablecoins are often seen as an exploration of digital fiat currency and hold particular significance for cross-border payments, trade settlement, and other scenarios. The advancement of such projects also typically reflects the active stance of the respective country on blockchain policies.
However, competition in the stablecoin sector is fierce. For KGST to establish itself in this ecosystem, besides the compliance background, it also needs support from practical operational indicators such as liquidity, ecosystem applications, and user adoption. Ultimately, the market will judge based on actual performance.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WenMoon42
· 4h ago
National endorsement sounds good, but liquidity is the key.
View OriginalReply0
RealYieldWizard
· 12-27 07:32
Sounds good, but liquidity is the key. No matter how strong the compliance is, if no one uses it, it's pointless.
Government endorsement sounds great, but I'm afraid it will ultimately become a "policy coin" that no one touches.
Can it be comparable to USDT? Honestly, I have some doubts.
The problem with official stablecoins is that they are too centralized. Isn't this just CBDC with a different name?
Liquidity + ecosystem—if you can't handle these two, forget about everything else, really.
View OriginalReply0
PoetryOnChain
· 12-26 10:57
National endorsement sounds good, but whether it can truly survive depends on whether users buy into it.
View OriginalReply0
NFTDreamer
· 12-26 10:53
National endorsement sounds appealing, but what truly matters are liquidity and applications.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 12-26 10:51
National endorsement sounds impressive, but honestly, liquidity is the key.
No matter how strong the compliance is, if no one uses it, it's pointless. It all depends on whether KGST can truly make a breakthrough.
The competition in this track has become intense. Another one? Let's wait and see.
The USDT model is deeply ingrained. Want to shake it up? The difficulty is not ordinary.
Nominal government support, but in practice, it still depends on ourselves.
Compared to concept hype, I care more about actual trading volume and the number of holders.
View OriginalReply0
SleepyValidator
· 12-26 10:49
National endorsement sounds good, but I'm worried it might just be on paper. Without liquidity, everything is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
DataPickledFish
· 12-26 10:42
National endorsement sounds good, but can it really beat USDT? It still seems to depend on subsequent ecosystem development.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observer
· 12-26 10:29
Government endorsement sounds good, but frankly, it still depends on on-chain data and actual trading volume. Having compliance alone without an ecosystem is just a shell.
The emergence of the KGST stablecoin in the blockchain space is indeed somewhat special — it is the first stablecoin project to receive national support.
In the current stablecoin market, dominated by USD-pegged products like USDT and USDC, KGST, as a stablecoin backed by national-level support, opens another window. This official backing usually signifies stronger credit endorsement and compliance advantages. Compared to purely commercial stablecoin projects, the transparency of risk management may adhere to higher standards.
From a technical and application perspective, government-supported stablecoins are often seen as an exploration of digital fiat currency and hold particular significance for cross-border payments, trade settlement, and other scenarios. The advancement of such projects also typically reflects the active stance of the respective country on blockchain policies.
However, competition in the stablecoin sector is fierce. For KGST to establish itself in this ecosystem, besides the compliance background, it also needs support from practical operational indicators such as liquidity, ecosystem applications, and user adoption. Ultimately, the market will judge based on actual performance.