Commercial rockets can now go public, which is quite impressive in itself. However, the real interest doesn't lie in the IPO itself, but in the fact that it openly states a harsh reality—some ventures must burn money continuously for many years before they can see a glimmer of success.
In recent years, what are commercial rocket companies afraid of? To be honest, their biggest fear is not failure. The true nightmare is: before failure even occurs, funding runs out, and the path is blocked. Money keeps burning endlessly, technology advances bit by bit, sounding like steady progress. But during this process, the capital market keeps asking the same question: When will you make money? When will you see a return? Sometimes, this pressure is more deadly than technical challenges. Many projects fail not because of technical issues, but because of the irreconcilable tension between long-term financing and short-term accountability. To some extent, going public is a form of compromise—it acknowledges the necessity of burning money and provides entrepreneurs with credit to keep moving forward.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TradingNightmare
· 11h ago
Capital is just about rushing the schedule, but with rockets, you really can't rush it at all.
View OriginalReply0
StakeOrRegret
· 13h ago
That's quite realistic. This is the curse of entrepreneurship—it's not dying from technical issues but from running out of money.
The accountability system in the capital market is basically poison for some industries, really.
Going public is like an official acknowledgment that "I need to spend money," which sounds a bit harsh.
The contradiction between financing and accountability boils down to mismatched timeframes that can't be reconciled.
Surviving is the key—it's better than anything else.
Burning money to see the dawn might sound absurd in other industries, but that's just how rockets work.
Long-term credit lines for financing can be exchanged for going public; this business is still worth it.
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugee
· 12-27 14:04
At the end of the day, it's still capital anxiety; I can only sleep well after looking at quarterly report data.
View OriginalReply0
MissedTheBoat
· 12-26 10:59
In plain terms, the capital market has finally acknowledged one thing: some dreams just can't be ignited.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 12-26 10:58
ngl this is just the accumulation phase playing out in real time. the statistical significance here isn't the ipo itself, it's the market finally admitting that some patterns require years of patient capital burn before the algorithmic footprints start showing returns. fascinating behavioral indicator, actually.
Reply0
zkProofGremlin
· 12-26 10:51
Honestly, this is the real dilemma in the Web3 and aerospace fields. Short-sightedness in capital is truly remarkable.
---
Burning money to buy time—this logic has long been played out in the crypto world, and now rockets have to do the same.
---
Rather than saying going public is a compromise, it's more like being forced into self-rescue... The financiers simply don't understand long-termism.
---
The key is that the pressure after going public won't be less; instead, you'll have to deal with more Wall Street nitpicking.
---
That's why I have little hope for most fundraising projects; capital is synonymous with seeking quick gains.
---
If rockets have to play like this, then Web3 projects claiming to change the world are even more of a joke.
---
Wait, how did those projects that received sky-high funding survive? Haven't they faced funding shortages?
---
Short-term accountability in the capital market vs. the long-term need for innovation—this contradiction should have been addressed long ago.
---
So ultimately, it's about finding the right backers. Patient capital and short-sighted capital are truly worlds apart.
---
Going public actually gives entrepreneurs a chance to escape VC control, a perspective no one talks about.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMO
· 12-26 10:47
Basically, it's like an abusive love affair in the capital market—you won't let go until you see ROI.
View OriginalReply0
FalseProfitProphet
· 12-26 10:35
That's the truth, this is reality. Losing money is faster than dying from technical issues.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTradingGuru
· 12-26 10:34
The root of the bottleneck is not technology, but the patience of the big investors.
View OriginalReply0
MevHunter
· 12-26 10:33
The capital market vampire only loosens up when it sees cash flow, but some things just can't wait that long.
Commercial rockets can now go public, which is quite impressive in itself. However, the real interest doesn't lie in the IPO itself, but in the fact that it openly states a harsh reality—some ventures must burn money continuously for many years before they can see a glimmer of success.
In recent years, what are commercial rocket companies afraid of? To be honest, their biggest fear is not failure. The true nightmare is: before failure even occurs, funding runs out, and the path is blocked. Money keeps burning endlessly, technology advances bit by bit, sounding like steady progress. But during this process, the capital market keeps asking the same question: When will you make money? When will you see a return? Sometimes, this pressure is more deadly than technical challenges. Many projects fail not because of technical issues, but because of the irreconcilable tension between long-term financing and short-term accountability. To some extent, going public is a form of compromise—it acknowledges the necessity of burning money and provides entrepreneurs with credit to keep moving forward.