Futures
Hundreds of contracts settled in USDT or BTC
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
$20 Billion Deal:
Why did Jensen Huang buy his fiercest enemy?
-
On Christmas night, while the world was busy with holidays, Jensen Huang (Nvidia CEO) made a chess move studied in acquisition books.
The obvious news: "Nvidia pays $20 billion for Groq technology."
But the deeper meaning:
Nvidia is admitting for the first time that its "armor" has a vulnerability.
-
To understand the story, we need to understand the difference between "training" AI and "running" it (Inference):
Nvidia is the undisputed queen of "training."
Its chips (H100 & Blackwell) are massive factories for building intelligent minds.
But when it comes to "use" (when you ask ChatGPT and it responds), Nvidia's chips are considered "an elephant in a china shop";
Very powerful, but expensive, slow, and consuming enormous energy for simple, quick tasks.
-
Here, Groq posed the real threat.
Its (LPU) technology didn't rely on raw power but on insane speed (Inference Speed).
It was 10 times faster and cheaper to operate, making it the smarter choice for companies that want to run models, not train them.
-
Why now?
And why in this way?
Bridging the only gap:
Jensen realized that the future is shifting from "building models" to "consuming them."
By acquiring Groq and its team (led by Jonathan Ross), he's not just buying a competitor but also the "speed" he lacks to dominate the entire AI lifecycle:
From heavy training to instant response.
-
The escape game from the "guillotine":
Note that the deal is not a "full acquisition" but a "technology licensing and talent hiring" strategy.
Why?
Because the DOJ (Department of Justice) would have stopped any full acquisition immediately.
Jensen cleverly "sucked in" the talent and technology, leaving the "empty shell" of the company to avoid legal battles. It's a legal workaround with engineering genius.
-
Impact on the company's (and market):
This deal kills the dreams of competitors (like AMD and Intel) in dominating the "Inference Market" (which is valued at $255 billion by 2030.
Nvidia now tells the market:
"There's no need to go elsewhere. I have the training power, and now I have the speed to run."
-
Investor takeaway:
Jensen Huang is not playing defense to defend his title but is playing to eliminate the championship altogether.
By integrating LPU technology into the CUDA ecosystem, Nvidia is transforming from a "chip company" into a "closed ecosystem" that's hard to exit.
Follow me
)and share your opinion: Do you think regulatory authorities will allow this kind of "covert acquisition" in the future?