2025-12-27 14:23:04

The secret to making huge profits in prediction markets often lies in the most inconspicuous places—those terms, restrictions, and definitions. Take Polymarket as an example, the players who truly profit are not the ones making money from news sensitivity.

Recently, the market for the declassified document disclosure is a typical example. While most people celebrate and cheer for tens of thousands of declassified contents, with the YES odds soaring to 99%, what are the savvy traders doing? They are studying the Resolution Rules. Because how the market ultimately settles is not determined by the news facts, but by those seemingly dull rules and clauses.

This is called "Rule Kill"—it's not about who predicts the news more accurately, but about who understands the game rules more thoroughly. The YES that market sentiment pushes up may instantly turn into a joke due to a definitional ambiguity. This is the dark side of prediction markets—information asymmetry often loses to rule asymmetry.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PumpBeforeRug

· 4h ago

Haha, that's why I never follow the hype and trade news first. Read the terms first. --- The rule-based kill is truly unbeatable. 99% of people don't realize they're just playing a word game. --- Polymarket works like this: those who understand the rules get the profits, others get the leek. --- So the key is how the resolution is defined, not the news itself, right? --- I've known for a long time that most traders don't bother to read the terms carefully. That's the real alpha. --- I've seen this trick too many times: a single ambiguity can directly reverse the outcome. It's hilarious. --- Those still paying attention to news sensitivity are just throwing money away, brother. --- Rule asymmetry > information asymmetry, but how many people have really studied this in depth? --- It feels like prediction markets are just places for rule sellers to make money; the terms are the deciding factor. --- When 99% rush to YES, I always wonder if there's a definition problem. Sure enough.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsPolice

· 12-27 14:53

The rule-based kill technique is brilliant; 99% of people only read the news, while smart money has already been digging into the terms.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 12-27 14:52

This is the real battlefield. Most people are still watching the news, while smart money is already reading the fine print. --- When the odds hit 99%, I knew the hunter had already set the trap. Rules are the supply line of this game. --- In simple terms, the information war has escalated to a rules war. You may win the emotional battle but still lose to the definitions. --- The example of Polymarket is quite typical. Most people are celebrating, while those who truly understand are calculating things that can't be derived from probability alone. --- No wonder some always make a profit in prediction markets. It's not about sensitivity, but about thoroughly understanding the contract terms. I need to catch up on my lessons. --- When YES jumps to 99, it's actually the most dangerous signal. The crazier the market, the sharper the rules are being honed. --- That's why survival comes first. Even the right judgment must survive the trap of rules. --- Ambiguous terms can instantly kill market sentiment. This move is truly ruthless. You need to learn to reverse your perspective on the rules when emotions are at their peak.

View OriginalReply0

GraphGuru

· 12-27 14:50

Well... basically, it's just a word game to make money, an old trick.

View OriginalReply0

GasGuru

· 12-27 14:44

The rule-based kill set is truly unbeatable. Most people only pay attention to news trends and never consider the settlement logic layer. That's how Polymarket is—its detailed terms are full of traps. This is the real alpha.

View OriginalReply0

ContractExplorer

· 12-27 14:44

Haha, that's why most people suffer huge losses on Polymarket; those who truly make money are the ones who capitalize on the details. Speaking of which, the rule-based kill set is really ruthless... Clauses that seem insignificant actually become the meat grinder. Polymarket's resolution oracle really has a big heart, just waiting for someone to step into the trap. This move is an upgraded version of information warfare, where the more twisted your understanding of the rules, the better haha. Actually, I’ve known for a long time that only those who understand the boring clauses can survive until the end. It's just an IQ tax; 99% of people only read the news, while 1% study how the clauses are written.

View OriginalReply0