This afternoon at 5:00 PM, my trading monitoring system detected trading signals for the three cryptocurrencies DASH, ZEN, and ZEC. The system has a scoring mechanism that automatically assigns a score to each signal.
The scoring range is from -4 to 7. A key setting here is that the monitor defaults to only display signals with a score above 1, which helps filter out most noise and false signals, improving the signal-to-noise ratio. The numbers seen on the screen are the real-time scoring results.
This mechanism has been in operation for some time. Although not 100% accurate, it still helps in filtering effective trading opportunities. Recently, DASH, ZEN, and ZEC have shown different characteristics; those interested can follow up and observe on their own.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ruggedNotShrugged
· 5h ago
Hey, the -4 to 7 point mechanism sounds pretty good, but is the 1 point positioning a bit strict?
Feels like DASH is about to rise again, is ZEC just following the trend or does it have real potential?
No matter how powerful the system is, it still depends on the market sentiment. 100% accuracy is just fooling yourself.
These three coins are a bit old-fashioned, still focusing on these two in 2024?
Signal-to-noise ratio really needs to be controlled well, otherwise the daily chasing highs routine will be the same.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTearjerker
· 12-29 08:00
This filtering mechanism sounds good, but I'm worried that when it comes to actually making money, it still depends on luck.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologis
· 12-27 15:55
The concept of signal-to-noise ratio is actually borrowed from early data art, which is interesting. However, no matter how smart the system is, it can only be a tool; ultimately, it still depends on human judgment.
View OriginalReply0
RektDetective
· 12-27 15:55
It sounds like you're selling systems again. With such a high signal-to-noise ratio, why haven't you made a fortune yet?
---
DASH, ZEN, ZEC? Do these three coins really have signals recently, or is it just machine hallucination?
---
If it's above 1 point, it shows; do you filter out those from -4 to 0 points? Feels a bit too optimistic.
---
The automatic scoring mechanism sounds good, but I just want to ask, what is the actual accuracy rate?
---
How long has this system been running? Can I see the win rate?
---
It seems every time people say there's a system with signals, but in the end, it's still luck-based gambling.
---
That coin ZEC isn't hot anymore, so why bother following it?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecoder
· 12-27 15:55
According to research, the signal filtering mechanism's approach to optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio is indeed feasible, but it is worth noting whether the 1-point threshold setting has been statistically validated.
From a technical perspective, the score range from -4 to 7 implies a hidden assumption—that the volatility characteristics of each cryptocurrency are the same. This may need to be re-evaluated in practical operations.
By the way, the simultaneous appearance of privacy coins DASH, ZEN, and ZEC—what is the underlying logic? Is it technical correlation or market resonance? I'm a bit curious.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122
· 12-27 15:52
Wow, only shows above 1 point? The filtering is pretty good.
---
Is the system scoring reliable, or is it just another cycle of losing money?
---
DASH, ZEN, ZEC three together, is this an all-in move, brother?
---
The concept of signal-to-noise ratio is pretty good, but is it really accurate in practice?
---
Feels like there's too much trust in the algorithm, be careful of being cut.
---
This mechanism has been around for so long, can it really make money, honestly?
---
Suddenly three signals appear at the same time, is it a concentrated outbreak or just a coincidence?
---
The design of the -4 to 7 point range is quite interesting, how is it calculated?
---
Only looking at above 1 point, are everything from 0 to 1 points trash?
---
Another old coin like DASH, when will it turn around?
---
Is this scoring system really better than manually analyzing the charts?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainRetirementHome
· 12-27 15:27
The system scoring mechanism is good, but I want to ask how the actual win rate is?
This afternoon at 5:00 PM, my trading monitoring system detected trading signals for the three cryptocurrencies DASH, ZEN, and ZEC. The system has a scoring mechanism that automatically assigns a score to each signal.
The scoring range is from -4 to 7. A key setting here is that the monitor defaults to only display signals with a score above 1, which helps filter out most noise and false signals, improving the signal-to-noise ratio. The numbers seen on the screen are the real-time scoring results.
This mechanism has been in operation for some time. Although not 100% accurate, it still helps in filtering effective trading opportunities. Recently, DASH, ZEN, and ZEC have shown different characteristics; those interested can follow up and observe on their own.