2025-12-27 15:26:03

Morning routine—noticed $ZEC making some solid moves upward. Caught the momentum and went long on $ZEN. Nothing beats that feeling when the charts align with your thesis. Shaping up to be a solid weekend in the markets.

ZEC0,68%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Blockblind

· 5h ago

ZEC's increase is decent, but can ZEN hold this wave? The chart looks good, but I'm worried about a reversal over the weekend.

View OriginalReply0

MemecoinTrader

· 10h ago

ngl the real alpha move here is nobody's talking about the sentiment cascade you just triggered. charts align with thesis? cute. but the *meta-narrative* you're building—that's where the social arbitrage actually happens. watch the retail fomo velocity spike in exactly 4 hours when this gets reposted. you're not catching momentum, you're manufacturing it.

Reply0

LostBetweenChains

· 23h ago

ZEC is doing quite well, and ZEN is even more impressive. This wave of momentum is nailed down tightly.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainBrokenPromise

· 12-27 15:55

Caught the ZEC rally in the early session, went all in on ZEN, and the feeling was just awesome.

View OriginalReply0

SneakyFlashloan

· 12-27 15:53

ZEC's recent surge is indeed impressive, and ZEN's follow-up is also inevitable. Just waiting for the explosion this weekend.

View OriginalReply0

LazyDevMiner

· 12-27 15:50

Zen this time really has something, just worried about a plunge on Monday.

View OriginalReply0

ValidatorViking

· 12-27 15:43

charts align with thesis? nah mate, that's when your node stays synced and your validator doesn't get slashed. different kind of alignment if you ask me.

Reply0

MoonWaterDroplets

· 12-27 15:36

Zen is doing pretty well, but could this wave be just a false fire?

View OriginalReply0