2025-12-27 16:20:34

Recently, I came across an interesting token design—both buying and selling are taxed, and the tax is used for buyback and burn. In simple terms, this model automatically destroys circulating supply, creating scarcity.

Currently, this project has been running for about 4 days, and the burn scale has already reached nearly 300 million tokens. Interestingly, BNB continues to flow into the pool, which usually indicates that there is capital optimistic about this direction.

According to the mechanism simulation, when the burn reaches 500 million to 700 million tokens, what kind of price reaction might occur due to changes in circulating supply? This is a question worth observing. Many people are still watching the long-term effects of this kind of self-burn model.

BNB3,03%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainWanderingPoet

· 17h ago

Buying and selling are both taxed, sounds pretty good at first... but it feels like this is just another way to cut the leeks in the end. This self-destruct design sounds sexy, but in reality, it's just raising expectations. BNB flowing into the pool? That might just be the whales hyping themselves up; there aren't that many true believers. Destroying down to the 5-7 billion range, honestly, I remain skeptical. Often, these projects don't burn even half of it before cooling off, while those who work quietly every day tend to last longer. What I care more about is team transparency and real use cases, not these flashy destruction numbers... what about you? Wait, 300 million destroyed in 4 days... isn't that a bit too fast? Something doesn't feel right.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropAutomaton

· 12-28 04:09

4 days, 300 million destroyed... This pace is pretty intense. BNB is still coming in, which means some people really believe in this.

View OriginalReply0

BoredWatcher

· 12-27 16:44

The destruction mechanism sounds good, but honestly, I've seen too many of these models. The key is how long it can actually be sustained. --- Continuous inflow of BNB into the pool? That might not be a good sign; sometimes it's just the whales accumulating. --- By the time the destruction reaches 500 million, someone will have already run away. Don't get your hopes up. --- Haha, both self-destruction and scarcity—why does this kind of pitch never get old? --- Destroying 300 million in 4 days, such speed... I'm actually a bit worried now. --- Is it really going to be that perfect, or will it end up a mess in the end? --- What's the point of waiting and watching? I've seen through the tricks of these kinds of projects long ago. --- It's somewhat interesting, but let's see if it can survive past next month.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSupportGroup

· 12-27 16:43

This destruction mechanism looks pretty good, but it still depends on how long it can be sustained... Projects like this tend to attract hot money in the early stages, but the real test is whether new traffic comes in after reaching a certain level of destruction. As long as the pool continues to replenish BNB, it indicates that it's still alive, but how much of a price increase can 5 to 7 billion in destruction generate... honestly, it's a bit uncertain. Destruction itself is good, but the key is whether someone is actually using this project. 3 billion in destruction early on sounds like a lot, but pushing this mechanism to the limit... I'm still a bit cautious. High popularity in the first four days is normal; the biggest concern is the lack of freshness afterward and the flow of BNB stopping. This kind of topic is easy to hype up but also easy to get caught in a trap. Watching the destruction numbers rise happily doesn't necessarily mean the price will move accordingly, bro. Relying on automatic destruction to maintain scarcity isn't a problem, but you have to be wary that this might just be a scheme to harvest the little guys. The detail of continuously adding BNB is good; at least it shows it's not completely dumping the market.

View OriginalReply0

GasBandit

· 12-27 16:40

Burned 300 million in just 4 days? That's pretty fast, but the real highlight is 500-700 million, right?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrying

· 12-27 16:38

Ha, it's the self-d destruction trick again... 300 million tokens in 4 days sounds smooth, but the real key is whether it can withstand that level of destruction without collapsing.

View OriginalReply0

MetaNomad

· 12-27 16:36

Buy and sell double taxation destruction—I've seen several versions of this gameplay. The key still depends on the holder's mindset; otherwise, it's just a way to harvest the little guys.

View OriginalReply0

ClassicDumpster

· 12-27 16:34

Such aggressive burning, yet the pool is still accumulating BNB... I think it's just a matter of time, a wave is bound to come sooner or later.

View OriginalReply0