Zcash perpetuals just launched on GMX at $63—a brutal 98% drop from its $3200 all-time high. But here's what's catching attention: the project's selective disclosure tech is proving useful for enterprises that need to demonstrate compliance without spilling sensitive data. As Q1 2025 regulations take shape, there's a clearer line forming between compliant privacy solutions and straight-up anonymous coins. The Raoul Pal partnership is another signal that macro-focused capital is starting to take privacy tech seriously. Worth watching as the regulatory landscape tightens.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropChaser
· 15h ago
98% crash is really brutal... But to be honest, compliance and privacy are the long-term solutions.
Wait, Raoul Pal has even stepped down? It seems macro capital is indeed re-evaluating this area.
Privacy technology has shifted from pure anonymity to enterprise-level compliance tools, and this transition is quite interesting.
GMX's launch price was so disappointing, what about the early holders' hard work... But if the ecosystem is to be developed,
Regulation shaping up is definitely something to keep a close eye on. It feels like many coins will need to re-position themselves.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 12-29 06:34
Falling from 3200 to 63, this cut in half is really brutal... But on the other hand, the direction of privacy compliance does have potential, not just pure anonymous coins being recklessly developed.
---
Did Raoul Pal make a move? It looks like big capital is taking it seriously, with not many regulatory windows left.
---
A 98% drop is hard to accept, but I believe in its selective disclosure approach; it might really turn around.
---
Wait, aren't they no longer just pure anonymous coins? This shift is quite interesting and aligns with regulatory trends.
---
GMX launched perpetual contracts and immediately dropped to $63, which is a bit tragic... But the privacy compliance technology behind it seems to have caught the eye of major enterprises.
---
It sounds like they are working on compliant privacy, not underground coins. That’s the right approach.
---
If Raoul Pal follows up, it indicates that institutions are starting to seriously look at the privacy track, and projects that fit regulatory standards might be the way out.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvice
· 12-29 05:05
ZEC dropped from 3200 to 63, this decline... is outrageous, but on the other hand, the selective disclosure approach does have some merit. Not many projects can achieve compliance and privacy simultaneously.
Raoul Pal has started to pay attention to the privacy track, and this signal is quite clear—big capital has sensed something.
With regulation coming, anonymous coins might be in trouble, but privacy solutions could be the real hot spot. It's worth pondering.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMotivator
· 12-27 22:52
Wow, dropping from 3200 to 63—how many stop-loss orders does that trigger... But privacy technology does have a real opportunity; is it actually a good thing that regulations are coming?
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiChallenger
· 12-27 22:46
98% crash still talking about compliance narratives, data speaks for itself, brother
---
Ironically, no matter how good the technology is, merchants can't save it
---
Raoul Pal's endorsement can make it rise? What about the lessons of history
---
I've heard this compliance and privacy rhetoric before, last time it was that same project
---
Objectively speaking, from $3200 to $63, this is the best risk warning
---
Interesting, with tighter regulation, now privacy coins are in focus—this logic is a bit extreme
---
Not to be sarcastic, but anyone who watched the 2017 cycle should be wary of stories about overtaking on curves
---
Compliance privacy solutions? Nice words, just want regulatory approval and to keep a sense of mystery
---
Before entering, ask yourself: why did institutions run from $3200 to $63
---
Companies use selective disclosure for compliance... this sounds just like a new packaging for ICO projects
View OriginalReply0
TokenCreatorOP
· 12-27 22:36
98% crash is indeed quite brutal... but privacy technology really has potential, compliance is the way to go
---
Raoul has entered the market, indicating that major capital is indeed re-evaluating privacy issues
---
From anonymous coins to compliant privacy, this transition is quite interesting... who can survive is the real highlight
---
$63 and people still believe Zcash can make a comeback? It depends on whether this technology can truly be commercialized
---
With tighter regulation, does it give privacy projects with real use cases a chance?
---
Selective disclosure technology sounds good, but the key is whether it can be exploited or not
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabond
· 12-27 22:36
98% decline is painful, but on the other hand, privacy compliance is indeed the future direction.
From anonymous coins to enterprise-level privacy solutions, the track is being reshaped. Whether Zcash can survive depends on this.
Raoul Pal has started to play with privacy, indicating that big capital has sensed the opportunity... Once the regulatory framework is set in 2025, there will be a chance.
When prices die, compliance technology actually thrives—it's a bit magical.
View OriginalReply0
RamenStacker
· 12-27 22:34
98% decline is too tragic, but the technical application logic indeed points in the right direction.
---
Privacy coins are really shifting towards compliance tools, no longer just playing hide-and-seek. It feels like this is the way out.
---
What does Raoul Pal's entry mean? Are the macro bigwigs really starting to understand the value of privacy?
---
From anonymous coins to compliance tools, can Zcash's turnaround save it... or has the price already reflected everything?
---
Selective disclosure is indeed impressive, but is $63 Zcash enough to convince regulators? That's the real issue.
---
The period of regulatory shaping is a window of opportunity. Whoever makes privacy + compliance a standard first wins.
---
$63 ZEC is a bit hopeless, but if the technology can truly open up the enterprise market, that's another story.
---
This time it's not about hype around privacy coins, but privacy becoming infrastructure—it's fundamentally different.
View OriginalReply0
NotGonnaMakeIt
· 12-27 22:30
98% decline can't be sustained anymore, but this selective disclosure technology seems to have some real potential
From pure anonymous coins to compliant privacy solutions, the track is being reshaped
Raoul Pal endorses it, big capital is also quietly deploying
Regulations are coming, privacy coins will either die or transform into enterprise tools, there's no middle ground
$63 price... early believers must be under a lot of pressure
Compliance is the only lifeline for privacy coins; pure pornography and gambling use cases should really be abandoned
Once Q1 regulations are implemented, it will be clear who survives and who doesn't
How deep are the perpetual positions on GMX? Could it be another rinse-and-repeat scheme?
This is the real game in the privacy track—technology or politics
Zcash perpetuals just launched on GMX at $63—a brutal 98% drop from its $3200 all-time high. But here's what's catching attention: the project's selective disclosure tech is proving useful for enterprises that need to demonstrate compliance without spilling sensitive data. As Q1 2025 regulations take shape, there's a clearer line forming between compliant privacy solutions and straight-up anonymous coins. The Raoul Pal partnership is another signal that macro-focused capital is starting to take privacy tech seriously. Worth watching as the regulatory landscape tightens.