The quant team has invested a significant amount of data science work in anti-witch hunting screening—employing techniques such as clustering analysis, behavior pattern recognition, and more. This plan also involved the participation of several senior protocols and well-known on-chain data analysts in the design process, making the final results quite reliable. Of course, if misjudgments still occur, users can fully file a complaint. In the long run, the relevant responsible persons emphasize that all value will ultimately be reflected at the token level, which is also the project's core commitment to ecosystem development.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainFortuneTeller
· 2025-12-31 07:20
Data scientists really think of themselves as gods; can clustering analysis identify witches? That's hilarious. In the end, it's still up to appeals to save the situation.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 2025-12-29 09:58
Data science plus an appeal mechanism sounds rigorous, but it still depends on how it's implemented.
View OriginalReply0
HalfIsEmpty
· 2025-12-28 23:56
Appealing... sounds easy, but it really takes a lot of effort.
View OriginalReply0
GetRichLeek
· 2025-12-28 11:51
Listen, buddy, clustering analysis, behavior pattern recognition... all these buzzwords and you still can't find my alt account, lol.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersPaper
· 2025-12-28 11:47
Data science, clustering analysis, behavior recognition... Just hearing these words feels like they're describing my trading records haha. Anyway, witch screening stuff—no matter how nicely it's said, it's still a knife that cuts.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleTreeHugger
· 2025-12-28 11:46
Hmm... that clustering analysis stuff, can it really filter out witches? I'm still a bit skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
PrivacyMaximalist
· 2025-12-28 11:46
Is the misjudgment appeal process really reliable? I'll have to wait in line for review again...
View OriginalReply0
CodeSmellHunter
· 2025-12-28 11:43
Data science sounds pretty impressive, but how likely is it to actually catch the witch?
View OriginalReply0
ForkLibertarian
· 2025-12-28 11:37
I think, when it comes to the misjudgment appeal process, the key still depends on how it is implemented in practice. Just talking about nice words doesn't cut it.
The quant team has invested a significant amount of data science work in anti-witch hunting screening—employing techniques such as clustering analysis, behavior pattern recognition, and more. This plan also involved the participation of several senior protocols and well-known on-chain data analysts in the design process, making the final results quite reliable. Of course, if misjudgments still occur, users can fully file a complaint. In the long run, the relevant responsible persons emphasize that all value will ultimately be reflected at the token level, which is also the project's core commitment to ecosystem development.