2025-12-31 15:28:16

Recently, a concept has been dominating the screens—300 million同行者. At first glance, it sounds a bit abstract, but upon closer thought, it’s quite clever. A leading exchange has gathered 300 million users, which means that on average, 1 in every 27 people worldwide believes in crypto assets and chooses to同行. From a different perspective, this is no longer a niche market concept. Speaking of project naming, I have to criticize a bit. The Chinese name同行者 is quite fitting, but as for the English name... how should I put it? I haven't seen any particularly decent token contract addresses yet, and the overall naming logic is a bit chaotic. Such detail issues are quite common in emerging ecosystems and have even become some kind of joke material. However, this doesn’t detract from the core value of the concept itself—user scale inherently reflects market recognition.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProxyCollector

· 2025-12-31 15:57

300 million users sounds impressive, but there's still no sign of the contract address. This tactic is really clever.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 2025-12-31 15:51

300 million users sounds impressive, but I'm more concerned about retention rates. History has shown that projects with flashy numbers are the most likely to die fastest in the next cycle.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingersFrontrun

· 2025-12-31 15:43

300 million users sounds impressive, but how many are actually active? --- The English name still doesn't have a decent contract so far, this planning is a bit ridiculous haha --- Out of 27 people, 1 holds tokens. I feel like no one around me dares to say they are all-in --- Rant aside, the scale is there, and the niche market should have died long ago --- The chaotic naming logic... why bother? Isn't it better to focus on making a good product --- Having a good Chinese name is a plus, but unfortunately the follow-up details fell a bit short --- That 300 million figure is probably exaggerated; wallet count and active users are not the same --- Anyway, I can't understand this move; I can't even tell what the contract address is, how can I trust you --- The core value is here, everything else is just clouds, users speak --- It's an emerging ecosystem, sure there are problems, but they aren't a big deal

View OriginalReply0

SandwichVictim

· 2025-12-31 15:32

300 million users is indeed impressive, but what is the actual interaction volume? That's the real key.

View OriginalReply0