2025-12-31 16:21:03

LISA this wave is really disappointing. When there was liquidity, you could see it; trading one lot would be squeezed for about ten bucks. After leaving the job, it completely turned into a "stablecoin." For that small airdrop of 2 to 30 bucks, you risk being squeezed for dozens of dollars every day. No matter how you calculate it, it's not worth it.

Trading with a constant heart attack, afraid of slippage spikes when placing orders, and worried about missing opportunities when canceling orders—it's completely a mental breakdown. Once liquidity dries up, even if the coin price is good, no one dares to take the risk, and in the end, it becomes an "invisible fee" for retail investors. There's really no need to bother with such tokens.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoGoldmine

· 18h ago

Once liquidity dies, ROI is completely gone. Looking at the data from the past 30 days, LISA's trading depth is similar to that of a third-tier coin, and the mining profit has already turned negative. For this kind of coin, it's really better to move the funds to a mining pool.

View OriginalReply0

DAOplomacy

· 18h ago

honestly the liquidity death spiral here is textbook path dependency issue—once you lose that critical mass of market makers, the non-trivial externalities just compound. risk/reward math doesn't check out anymore ngl

Reply0

AltcoinHunter

· 18h ago

A typical liquidity trap, I've fallen into it before... feeling like you're caught in a dilemma that makes you doubt life. Really, airdrops can't cover transaction fees at all. It's better to go all-in on a hundredfold opportunity.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOSapien

· 18h ago

When liquidity dries up completely, there's really no way out. The small airdrop of LISA in hand can't fill the gaps caused by being squeezed.

View OriginalReply0

TokenTaxonomist

· 18h ago

per my analysis, LISA's liquidity collapse post-delisting is textbook cryptographic darwinism... statistically speaking, the risk/reward ratio here is taxonomically incorrect. let me pull up my spreadsheet real quick – you're looking at potential slippage exceeding your airdrop gains by orders of magnitude. data suggests otherwise for any rational actor in this ecosystem.

Reply0

ChainSherlockGirl

· 18h ago

According to my analysis, the LISA incident is just a negative example, when liquidity evaporates, the coin becomes a steel gate, and retail investors rushing in are just getting cut. --- Breaking down mentally means constantly having your orders sliced, and this risk-reward ratio is completely shattered. --- Honestly, those small airdrops are not worth the daily anxiety; it's better to just pass. --- I've seen too many cases of liquidity drying up after resignation; even if the coin price looks good, it's all pointless because the bag holders have already run away. --- Laugh out loud, are hidden fees now so blatant? Slippage and order slicing are directly charged as percentages for profit. --- To be honest, LISA is just a teaching case, showing you what a liquidity trap looks like. --- Risking dozens of dollars every day to gamble on that 2 to 30 dollar airdrop, I really can't do the math on that haha.

View OriginalReply0

tokenomics_truther

· 18h ago

Damn, it's this kind of garbage liquidity again. I've been burned by this before. The trading slippage is terrifying, and I have to gamble on that tiny airdrop. The risk and reward are completely reversed. If no one is really playing, just don't touch it to save yourself the headache.

View OriginalReply0