Recently, a phenomenon worth noting: this year, the Nasdaq has risen by 21%, while Bitcoin has instead fallen by 18%. This is not just ordinary market fluctuation but reflects a fundamental shift in the pricing logic of crypto assets.
By 2025, Bitcoin and US stocks are no longer closely correlated as they once were. From the correlation coefficient perspective, the two have dropped from 0.68 in 2021 to 0.5 now, hitting a three-year low. Why is this happening? In fact, it’s because Bitcoin’s intrinsic value anchor is changing.
**Policy signals have become the dominant factor**
In the past few years, halving cycles were an important reference for Bitcoin’s movement. That’s no longer the case. The US government’s stance directly influences the price—when policies are friendly, prices surge; when progress falls short of expectations, collective sell-offs occur. The 30% drop in December was fundamentally driven by panic selling of leveraged positions.
**Institutional choices are very selective**
Major players like BlackRock and Fidelity have bought a significant amount of Bitcoin through ETFs, holding 5.7%-7.4% of the circulating supply. But you know what? They only care about mainstream coins. As long as the market cap is large enough and the regulatory framework is clear, it’s favored by institutions. As for other coins, in the eyes of institutions, they are just gambling tools and are not attractive at all.
What does this mean? Retail investors who still operate under the old logic of "if US stocks go up, Bitcoin will follow" will eventually suffer losses. Moving forward, Bitcoin’s trajectory is less about technical or emotional factors and more about policy and institutional capital. The rules of this game have already quietly changed.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCry
· 8h ago
Damn, the policy side has really started to take center stage. Retail investors are still analyzing charts, while institutions are already watching Washington.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 2025-12-31 16:51
Policy has become the main driver, and that's correct, but I still think retail investors should wake up.
Policy has become the new halving cycle, which indeed changes the game rules.
If US stocks rise while Bitcoin falls, it indicates that big funds are repositioning.
Institutions should just stick to mainstream coins; retail investors are still daydreaming in altcoins.
With Baidu holding such a large amount of Bitcoin in circulation, is it a good thing or a hidden risk?
Is a 30% drop really caused by this? Wow, leverage funds really dare to play.
The correlation coefficient dropped from 0.68 to 0.5, indicating whether Bitcoin's independence is strengthening or losing control.
Still relying on US stock market trends to predict crypto prices? That's basically just giving away money.
View OriginalReply0
DoomCanister
· 2025-12-31 16:51
Wow, the policy game is so fierce, retail investors are still looking at K-line charts, the game has long changed its rules.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiAlchemist
· 2025-12-31 16:51
the old playbook is burning, ngl... policy arbitrage is the new philosopher's stone here, transmuting retail conviction into institutional liquidation patterns. that 0.5 correlation coefficient? *adjusts alchemical instruments* it's literally the mathematical death knell of the "stonks go up, btc follows" era.
Reply0
SerumSqueezer
· 2025-12-31 16:43
Wow, so the policy side is in charge? Doesn't that mean us retail investors have to follow Washington's lead?
Recently, a phenomenon worth noting: this year, the Nasdaq has risen by 21%, while Bitcoin has instead fallen by 18%. This is not just ordinary market fluctuation but reflects a fundamental shift in the pricing logic of crypto assets.
By 2025, Bitcoin and US stocks are no longer closely correlated as they once were. From the correlation coefficient perspective, the two have dropped from 0.68 in 2021 to 0.5 now, hitting a three-year low. Why is this happening? In fact, it’s because Bitcoin’s intrinsic value anchor is changing.
**Policy signals have become the dominant factor**
In the past few years, halving cycles were an important reference for Bitcoin’s movement. That’s no longer the case. The US government’s stance directly influences the price—when policies are friendly, prices surge; when progress falls short of expectations, collective sell-offs occur. The 30% drop in December was fundamentally driven by panic selling of leveraged positions.
**Institutional choices are very selective**
Major players like BlackRock and Fidelity have bought a significant amount of Bitcoin through ETFs, holding 5.7%-7.4% of the circulating supply. But you know what? They only care about mainstream coins. As long as the market cap is large enough and the regulatory framework is clear, it’s favored by institutions. As for other coins, in the eyes of institutions, they are just gambling tools and are not attractive at all.
What does this mean? Retail investors who still operate under the old logic of "if US stocks go up, Bitcoin will follow" will eventually suffer losses. Moving forward, Bitcoin’s trajectory is less about technical or emotional factors and more about policy and institutional capital. The rules of this game have already quietly changed.